Re: [dtn-interest] Representing SDNVs using ASN.1 notation

From: Scott Burleigh <Scott.Burleigh(at)jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Mon Jun 27 2005 - 11:20:21 EDT

Michael Demmer wrote:

>In spite of the fact that I proposed the SDNV design that we agreed
Yep, I agree with this too. It's a nice design.

>If we do decide to adopt this encoding, one question at hand is
I think we should both refer to the ASN.1 standard and also provide a brief recap in the LTP and Bundle Protocol specs for the convenience of the reader, with the caveat that anyone who wants to be sure to be ASN.1-conformant has got to go to the source documents. But we don't want to give the impression that we're starting our own branch of ASN.1 variants; if we're going to go with that standard, let's commit to it properly.

Scott

---

dtn-interest mailing list
dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest Received on Mon Jun 27 10:22:08 2005