RE: [dtn-interest] draft for updated DTN Architecture Internet Draft

From: Fall, Kevin <kevin.fall(at)intel.com>
Date: Sat Jul 16 2005 - 02:06:18 EDT

Thanks. I have made another pass on this document, and am very close to submitting it as the next I-D (due before Monday!). Please see attached. If there are any remaining comments, I will need them sometime this weekend.

Cheers,
- Kevin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Symington,Susan F. [mailto:SUSAN@mitre.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 1:19 PM
> To: Fall, Kevin; dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
> Subject: RE: [dtn-interest] draft for updated DTN Architecture
Internet
> Draft
are
> my comments. I wanted to give them to you now so you can get started
on
> them. If I have any more, I will send them tomorrow.
is
> used when "Source" should be used, etc.
that
> is "optionally enabled". Our intention is that the security model be
IDS
> "to direct diagnostic output to an entity other than the sender". I
endpoint".
> So according to the bundle protocol, the bundles directed to the
other
> nodes. In order to be sent to other nodes, a multicast endpoint ID
must
> be used.
should
> be renamed registrations.
be
> at least as hard..."
protocol.
> But there are three security-related delivery options that can be
Security
> Protocol).
sent
> in the BP and also the Custodial signals. I'm not sure. The
terminology
> used here is so different from that in the bundle protocol it's hard
for
> me to tell what's missing and extra, but here is what I think are the
custody
> signal. This however can either be a signal for success or for
failure.
>
> - There is no such thing as a Time Expired Error Indicator. I don't
but
> this isn't mentioned in the architecture document.
which
> case the reports will not be sent anywhere), but it must be present.
If
> reports are to go to the source, the source must be listed explicitly
in
> the report-to EID.
a
> finite period of time, specified by the application. Is this true? I
Kevin
> >Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 12:32 AM
> >To: dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
the
> >next IETF meeting, so I would like to receive any comments you folks
> >have prior to July 16.
> >
> >As you look through the attachment, you will notice several
> >places where
> >'XXX' appears. In general, the intention is to delete the material
> >surrounded by this mark, although there might be a couple of places
> >where it instead brings up an issue to consider.
> >
> >So, anyhow, please let me know if you have comments/concerns as
quickly
> >as possible so I can address them prior to the cutoff date.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >- Kevin
> >

---

dtn-interest mailing list
dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interestReceived on Sat Jul 16 02:17:18 2005