Mailing List Archive For dtn-interest@dtnrg.org Apr 2005 By Date

• Fri Apr 29 2005 - 18:19:17 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] NeighborhoodRouter Jakob Eriksson 
• Fri Apr 29 2005 - 10:26:19 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] NeighborhoodRouter Jeff Wilson 
• Wed Apr 27 2005 - 19:19:09 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] NeighborhoodRouter Jakob Eriksson 
• Wed Apr 27 2005 - 19:19:12 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] dtntunnel UDP-over-DTN forwarder Jakob Eriksson 
• Wed Apr 27 2005 - 19:19:08 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] Ethernet convergence layer Jakob Eriksson 
• Thu Apr 21 2005 - 15:52:58 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] IPN and Vint Cerf mentioned on Slashdot Matt Bradbury 
• Mon Apr 18 2005 - 15:01:09 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] mobility Brian D. Davison 
• Thu Apr 14 2005 - 12:26:33 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Bundle Authentication and Fragmentatoin Kevin Fall 
• Wed Apr 13 2005 - 11:30:35 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Bundle Authentication and Fragmentatoin Matt Bradbury 
• Wed Apr 13 2005 - 10:44:23 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Bundle Authentication and Fragmentatoin Stephen Farrell 
• Wed Apr 13 2005 - 10:20:21 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Bundle Authentication and Fragmentatoin Matt Bradbury 
• Wed Apr 13 2005 - 06:04:20 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Custody and Fragmentation Scott Burleigh 
• Wed Apr 13 2005 - 05:54:01 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Bundle Authentication and Fragmentatoin Stephen Farrell 
• Wed Apr 13 2005 - 05:56:02 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] Custody and Fragmentation Stephen Farrell 
• Wed Apr 13 2005 - 05:52:54 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Stephen Farrell 
• Wed Apr 13 2005 - 01:34:40 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Bundle Authentication and Fragmentatoin Scott Burleigh 
• Tue Apr 12 2005 - 16:47:56 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Bundle Authentication and Fragmentatoin Rajesh Krishnan 
• Tue Apr 12 2005 - 16:39:56 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] Bundle Authentication and Fragmentatoin Matt Bradbury 
• Tue Apr 12 2005 - 15:02:41 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Howard Weiss 
• Tue Apr 12 2005 - 14:26:06 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Stephen Farrell 
• Tue Apr 12 2005 - 14:09:32 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Rajesh Krishnan 
• Tue Apr 12 2005 - 13:05:37 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Stephen Farrell 
• Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:43:22 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Rajesh Krishnan 
• Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:25:41 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Peter TB Brett 
• Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:16:48 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Peter TB Brett 
• Tue Apr 12 2005 - 10:40:55 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Stephen Farrell 
• Tue Apr 12 2005 - 10:24:18 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Susan F. Symington 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 22:07:27 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] test Melissa Ho 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 20:15:42 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project) Scott Burleigh 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:51:49 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Peter TB Brett 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 16:09:15 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project) Michael Demmer 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 16:10:20 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Michael Demmer 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 15:58:59 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Rajesh Krishnan 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 15:19:31 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Scott Burleigh 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 15:09:33 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Scott Burleigh 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 15:05:42 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project) Scott Burleigh 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:47:08 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Susan F. Symington 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:11:37 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Rajesh Krishnan 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:43:10 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Susan F. Symington 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:23:56 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Stephen Farrell 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 12:53:48 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Stephen Farrell 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 12:49:43 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Susan F. Symington 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 12:42:59 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Michael Demmer 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 12:39:04 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project) Michael Demmer 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 12:33:57 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Stephen Farrell 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 12:17:29 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Bernard Peacock 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 12:15:24 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Michael Demmer 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 12:08:38 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Michael Demmer 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 10:10:38 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Susan F. Symington 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 05:04:01 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Scott Burleigh 
• Mon Apr 11 2005 - 00:17:14 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project) Scott Burleigh 
• Fri Apr 08 2005 - 14:57:45 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Howard Weiss 
• Fri Apr 08 2005 - 13:58:52 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Michael Demmer 
• Fri Apr 08 2005 - 11:55:02 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Howard Weiss 
• Fri Apr 08 2005 - 09:38:58 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Rajesh Krishnan 
• Fri Apr 08 2005 - 03:32:41 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Kevin Fall 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 20:20:55 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Rajesh Krishnan 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 19:39:05 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Jakob Eriksson 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 18:50:22 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Michael Demmer 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 18:36:36 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Jakob Eriksson 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 17:44:45 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Michael Demmer 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 16:24:22 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents Scott Burleigh 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 15:59:35 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Scott Burleigh 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 15:50:29 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Scott Burleigh 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 15:23:30 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Matt Bradbury 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 15:19:09 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents Rajesh Krishnan 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:49:11 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Michael Demmer 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:41:10 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Matt Bradbury 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:51:17 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project) Michael Demmer 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:51:54 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Michael Demmer 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:39:50 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents Michael Demmer 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:37:04 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project) Michael Demmer 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:34:33 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Schema names Michael Demmer 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:25:37 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents Rajesh Krishnan 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:26:59 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project) Scott Burleigh 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:13:08 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] Schema names Matt Bradbury 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:58:15 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents Michael Demmer 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:24:59 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents Rajesh Krishnan 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 06:39:34 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Care-of / reachable-thru EIDs - is ordering significant? Stephen Farrell 
• Thu Apr 07 2005 - 00:09:59 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] Re: wdtn deadline Melissa Ho 
• Wed Apr 06 2005 - 23:23:56 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE Scott Burleigh 
• Wed Apr 06 2005 - 21:20:53 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE Rajesh Krishnan 
• Wed Apr 06 2005 - 17:16:42 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] Demux tokens (was Re: Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project) Scott Burleigh 
• Wed Apr 06 2005 - 15:04:08 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Care-of / reachable-thru EIDs - is ordering significant? Rajesh Krishnan 
• Wed Apr 06 2005 - 12:38:54 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Scott Burleigh 
• Wed Apr 06 2005 - 11:32:38 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Care-of / reachable-thru EIDs - is ordering significant? Stephen Farrell 
• Wed Apr 06 2005 - 11:11:14 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Care-of / reachable-thru EIDs - is ordering significant? Rajesh Krishnan 
• Wed Apr 06 2005 - 09:07:07 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Care-of / reachable-thru EIDs - is ordering significant? Howard Weiss 
• Wed Apr 06 2005 - 07:41:09 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Care-of / reachable-thru EIDs - is ordering significant? Stephen Farrell 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 19:43:51 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Scott Burleigh 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 19:32:31 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Rajesh Krishnan 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 18:31:51 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Care-of / reachable-thru EIDs - is ordering significant? Rajesh Krishnan 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 18:16:34 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Scott Burleigh 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 17:27:36 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Kevin Fall 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 14:33:12 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] Care-of / reachable-thru EIDs - is ordering significant? Jakob Eriksson 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 14:15:34 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Scott Burleigh 
• Wed Apr 06 2005 - 14:15:41 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] DTN and Mobility/Security Paper franz 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 13:47:48 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Rajesh Krishnan 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 11:55:39 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Scott Burleigh 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 11:12:25 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Scott Burleigh 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 10:49:55 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Scott Burleigh 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 09:19:34 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Kevin Fall 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 08:57:13 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Matt Miller 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 08:49:18 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Scott,Keith L. 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 08:45:34 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Scott,Keith L. 
• Tue Apr 05 2005 - 04:55:22 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Stephen Farrell 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 20:07:46 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Leigh Torgerson 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 19:38:09 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Rajesh Krishnan 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 19:21:59 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] on ditching fragmentation Scott Burleigh 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 18:58:30 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Scott Burleigh 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 18:52:12 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Matt Bradbury 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 18:24:01 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Jakob Eriksson 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 14:03:14 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Michael Demmer 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 13:54:32 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Michael Demmer 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 13:35:27 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Stephen Farrell 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 14:07:38 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Michael Demmer 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 14:18:07 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] Architecture vs. Public DTN implementation Matt Bradbury 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 13:22:58 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Matt Bradbury 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 13:11:45 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Scott Burleigh 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 13:02:52 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Scott Burleigh 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 12:38:50 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Scott Burleigh 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 11:51:11 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Matt Bradbury 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 10:25:22 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] DTN without regions - I think I get it Scott,Keith L. 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 08:56:10 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Stephen Farrell 
• Mon Apr 04 2005 - 00:09:31 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] cross-post from our 'developing countries' project... Kevin Fall 
• Sun Apr 03 2005 - 22:32:53 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Keith Scott 
• Sun Apr 03 2005 - 22:21:31 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Keith Scott 
• Sun Apr 03 2005 - 20:43:27 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Michael Demmer 
• Sun Apr 03 2005 - 20:20:44 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Scott Burleigh 
• Sun Apr 03 2005 - 20:02:28 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Bundling Agents Scott Burleigh 
• Sun Apr 03 2005 - 19:48:12 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Bundling Agents Scott Burleigh 
• Sun Apr 03 2005 - 19:24:57 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Scott Burleigh 
• Sun Apr 03 2005 - 19:17:38 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Scott Burleigh 
• Sun Apr 03 2005 - 19:07:17 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Scott Burleigh 
• Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:09:50 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Keith Scott 
• Sun Apr 03 2005 - 16:40:12 EDT
  • RE: [dtn-interest] Bundling Agents Keith Scott 
• Sun Apr 03 2005 - 14:04:51 EDT
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Matt Bradbury 
• Sun Apr 03 2005 - 14:06:52 EDT
  • [dtn-interest] Bundling Agents Matt Bradbury 
• Sat Apr 02 2005 - 21:00:56 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Michael Demmer 
• Sat Apr 02 2005 - 20:51:34 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Michael Demmer 
• Sat Apr 02 2005 - 20:44:39 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Michael Demmer 
• Sat Apr 02 2005 - 18:44:07 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Scott Burleigh 
• Sat Apr 02 2005 - 16:01:15 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Matt Bradbury 
• Sat Apr 02 2005 - 14:53:18 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Matt Bradbury 
• Sat Apr 02 2005 - 14:18:18 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Scott Burleigh 
• Sat Apr 02 2005 - 13:31:30 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Scott Burleigh 
• Sat Apr 02 2005 - 12:46:55 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Michael Demmer 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 21:06:21 EST
  • [dtn-interest] request for the minutes at the last IETF meetings Kevin Fall 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 19:34:18 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Jakob Eriksson 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 19:06:29 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Matt Bradbury 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 18:34:45 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Jakob Eriksson 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:14:39 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Matt Bradbury 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:24:28 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Michael Demmer 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:32:53 EST
  • RE: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Scott,Keith L. 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:12:30 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Jakob Eriksson 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:55:47 EST
  • RE: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project team Scott,Keith L. 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:28:22 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Durst,Robert C. 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:10:29 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Rajesh Krishnan 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:49:56 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project Rajesh Krishnan 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:28:53 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project team Stephen Farrell 
• Fri Apr 01 2005 - 11:59:24 EST
  • Re: [dtn-interest] Comments on DTNRG documents from BBN SPINDLE project team Scott Burleigh 

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 17 2008 - 20:18:34 EDT