Hosting Provided By

Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's?

From: Mattias Ahnberg <mattias(at)ahnberg.pp.se>
Date: Fri Jul 27 2007 - 02:33:04 EDT

Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> EPO = SPOF = bad. We all know this.

I fail to see why one couldn't have TWO buttons of the same type that needed to be pressed after one another to close it down. It is unlikely that someone would trip and touch two separated buttons (although put close to one another).

Probably some logic behind why we don't have this. Or not?

-- 
/ahnberg.

Received on Fri Jul 27 02:48:39 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sam Stickland: "Re: Routing public traffic across county boundaries in Europe"
Previous message: Barton F. Bruce: "Re: History of the EPO (Emergency Power Off)"
In reply to: Alex Rubenstein: "RE: Why do we use facilities with EPO's?"
Next in thread: Alexander Harrowell: "Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's?"
Reply: Alexander Harrowell: "Re: Why do we use facilities with EPO's?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 29 2007 - 14:00:10 EDT