|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Dynamically Changing Exit Policy (iBGP)
From: Benjamin Howell <bhowell(at)iglou.com>
Date: Mon Oct 29 2007 - 20:35:16 EDT
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 04:53:50PM -0400, Deepak Jain wrote:
Point taken, but it's actually difficult to nail down all of our routes. We have some lone /24's that are not subnetted and thus cannot be used with an 'ip route ... null0' statement. When WAN connectivity drops, the routes flap if we don't have a stable iBGP session. Thus I'd like to steer well clear of severing the iBGP session. > The weights can be added/removed automatically by using a route-map on Only a single internal /30 route will be removed when an interface goes down. I can't come up with a route-map implementation that would add/remove the weights to the routes already received from our eBGP neighbors. If I'm missing something, please let me know. > Normally, however, you wouldn't use iBGP for this and you'd use a We use OSPF internally, but it just carries internal infrastructure addresses. I understand that OSPF is link-aware and can carry knowledge of link bandwidth, but I don't see how it would fit into our exit path policies. We accept full routes from our eBGP neighbors and it's not advisable to inject those into OSPF. Our normal policy must be best-exit, which leaves iBGP as the decision-maker unless I'm missing something. Is there a better IGP-based method of choosing a network exit path that would solve these problems? I ask because I'm curious, not because I know the answer. -- Ben HowellReceived on Mon Oct 29 20:37:13 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 19 2008 - 07:15:55 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||