|
|||||||||||
|
Re: impressions of a new user
From: Ben Goren <ben(at)trumpetpower.com>
Date: Fri Aug 15 2003 - 16:55:51 EDT On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 03:31:02PM -0500, Charles J. Fisher wrote: > All three files in (/etc/csh.cshrc /etc/csh.login
Bzzzt! Only a small minority of my systems have X on them. Besides, the PATH is already set by default to something more sane. The default PATH already contains these. There's no harm in having them in everybody's path, anyway. WOAH! This is about the most dangerous thing you can do. Raise your hands, everybody who's type a password too soon or too late, and had the system thought it was a command. Leave 'em up if you want that password now getting written to disk somewhere so you have to start trying to wipe it (or, worse, simply forget or don't realize what you've done). No hands remaining? What a surprise. > TMOUT=600
> umask 022
Already the default. > The above items enhance security.
No, they do not. At best, they duplicate the default behaviour. At worst, they're some of the most *IN*secure things you can do. > I can imagine no objection to their inclusion.
Then you have no imagination. Look, you have your ideas about how to configure the system; I have mine; and Theo has his. Theo gets to ship OpenBSD configured the way he likes because it's his baby. You can change Theo's configuration on your own system to suit your own needs, just as I do to suit mine. And that's the whole point. Cheers, b& -- Ben Goren mailto:ben@trumpetpower.com http://www.trumpetpower.com/ icbm:33o25'37"N_111o57'32"W [demime 0.98d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]Received on Fri Aug 15 17:21:28 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 13:29:30 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||