typo: flex(1)

$ cd /usr/src
$ patch </path/to/patch

The slash ('\') in the @@ -1917,7 +1917,7 @@ section was necessary to stop troff trying to expand the sentence.

jmc.

• usr.bin/lex/flex.1 Wed Jan 1 15:58:30 2003 +++ flex.new.1 Wed Jan 1 15:56:33 2003
  @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@
  Deficiencies / Bugs section below regarding "dangerous trailing context".) ^r an r, but only at the beginning of a line (i.e., - which just starting to scan, or right after a + just starting to scan, or right after a newline has been scanned). r$ an r, but only at the end of a line (i.e., just before a newline). Equivalent to "r/\\n".
  @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@
  .B yytext (see the next section), and calls to the .B unput() -function destroys the present contents of +function destroy the present contents of .B yytext, which can be a considerable porting headache when moving between different .I lex
  @@ -1264,7 +1264,7 @@
  while in the first example it's active in both, because in the first example the .B example -startion condition is an +start condition is an .I inclusive .B (%s) start condition.
  @@ -1383,10 +1383,10 @@
  .fi This scanner goes to a bit of trouble to match as much text as possible with each rule. In general, when attempting to write -a high-speed scanner try to match as much possible in each rule, as +a high-speed scanner try to match as much as possible in each rule, as it's a big win. .PP -Note that start-conditions names are really integer values and +Note that start-condition names are really integer values and can be stored as such. Thus, the above could be extended in the following fashion: .nf
  @@ -1917,7 +1917,7 @@
  can be used to control whether the current buffer's scanning context for the next token match is done as though at the beginning of a line. A non-zero macro argument makes rules anchored with -'^' active, while a zero argument makes '^' rules inactive. +\'^' active, while a zero argument makes '^' rules inactive. .PP The macro .B YY_AT_BOL()
  @@ -1928,7 +1928,7 @@
  switch statement and separated using .B YY_BREAK, which may be redefined. By default, it is simply a "break", to separate -each rule's action from the following rule's. +each rule's action from the following rules. Redefining .B YY_BREAK allows, for example, C++ users to
  @@ -2452,7 +2452,7 @@
  scanner tables should be generated - .I flex should not compress the -tables by taking advantages of similar transition functions for +tables by taking advantage of similar transition functions for different states. .IP .B \-CF
  @@ -3122,7 +3122,7 @@
  when it has scanned a token like "auto" and then the next character is something other than a newline or a letter. Previously it would then just match the "auto" rule and be done, but now it has no "auto" -rule, only a "auto\\n" rule. To eliminate the possibility of backing up, +rule, only an "auto\\n" rule. To eliminate the possibility of backing up, we could either duplicate all rules but without final newlines, or, since we never expect to encounter such an input and therefore don't how it's classified, we can introduce one more catch-all rule, this
  @@ -3170,7 +3170,7 @@
  first way is to simply compile a scanner generated by .I flex using a C++ compiler instead of a C compiler. You should not encounter -any compilations errors (please report any you find to the email address +any compilation errors (please report any you find to the email address given in the Author section below). You can then use C++ code in your rule actions instead of C code. Note that the default input source for your scanner remains
  @@ -3244,7 +3244,7 @@
  .B yy_delete_buffer(), and .B yyrestart() -(again, the first argument is a +(again, the first argument is an .B istream* object pointer). .PP
  @@ -3268,7 +3268,7 @@
  respectively. .TP .B virtual int yylex() -performs the same role is +performs the same role as .B yylex() does for ordinary flex scanners: it scans the input stream, consuming tokens, until a rule's action returns a value. If you derive a subclass
  @@ -3808,7 +3808,7 @@
  failed to notice the fact, meaning that .I flex scanned the first two sections looking for occurrences of these actions -and failed to find any, but somehow you snuck some in (via a #include +and failed to find any, but somehow you snuck some in (via an #include file, for example). Use .B %option reject or