|
|||||||||||
|
Re: ARC4 algorithm
From: Robin Carey <robin(at)wizardsworks.org>
Date: Mon Mar 17 2003 - 08:01:19 EST
> *laugh* Thank you for giving me so much to be happy about today. I mean,
I'm glad to be of service and am sorry to hear you're having problems in your life. > Well, this is one mistake we're trying to prevent. All we ask, is some
If you're talking about my Leoaprd9 algorithm; be aware that L9 has the same output bias as ARC4; the non-negligible probability that successive outputs are the same. This is fixed in Leopard10 (which I am still testing and am not ready to publish yet). > > One time pads are unbreakable.
Reference:
> > Yes I also came up with that idea. And I developed it much further to the
Sorry, I really can't be bothered going into the details. The source code for my vastly improved CSRNG is in my free software project; Caesarion. http://www.wizardsworks.org/~robin/cion.html > Will you be deleting my e-mail as well? Or will you finally answer my
I will be deleting your email in a few seconds after I've finished replying to it :) > Again!?! What was the shortcoming in V9?
See above.
cheers,
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 13:29:52 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||