Re: spinlocks

From: Will Ellis-Adams <admin(at)reifier.org>
Date: Tue Jan 15 2002 - 01:00:22 EST

I just mean to get the actual code not to give write access. I would think changes should be submitted for them to look over.... Or do you mean that even without write access someone might hack into it?

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Beihoffer" <markbeihoffer@hotmail.com>
> To: "Will Ellis-Adams" <admin@reifier.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:46 PM
> Subject: Re: spinlocks
>
>
> Hmm - who would be auditing the anonymous CVS entries?
>
> I'm a little paranoid that someone might try to slip a backdoor into the
> SMP

 > branch.
 >
 >> ----- Original Message -----

> > From: "Will Ellis-Adams" <admin@reifier.org>

> > To: <smp@openbsd.org>

> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:30 PM

> > Subject: spinlocks

> >
> >

 > > Looks like spinlocks.org got Slashdoted.
> > Maybe this will stir up some more SMP Motivation ;)

 > > Are you planning on giving anoncvs access to the code
 > > anytime soon? (spinlocks) I know cvs access was internal-only.
 > > You may find some help optimizing it that way. Also
 > > finding bugs etc...

> >                                 -Will

Received on Mon Dec 9 23:08:12 2002