Hosting Provided By

/. interview regarding new security hardware on x86

From: Thunder Bear <thunderbear(at)yonderway.com>
Date: Fri Jan 17 2003 - 11:59:35 EST

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/01/17/ 1430214&mode=nocomment&tid=137

Specifically, in his answer to question #3, this sales engineer from AMI (the x86 BIOS guys) asks "Sidenote: does any open-source developer want to check if these extensions could be used to improve SSH, SCP or GPG performance?"

Considering OpenBSD's already strong support for crypto hardware, I'm wondering what the crypto gurus here think about this.

Chris Hedemark .. Prospect Park, PA .. http://yonderway.com Homeland Security begins at home; support your Second Amendment.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (Darwin)

iD4DBQE+KDZ8YPuF4Zq9lvYRAuiNAJdlQPc6oWTXFmKbhbQfm2AHs42eAJ9lPhis 2dGQEJ9w+yGB2nJ2S5jQbQ==
=6lpT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Fri Jan 17 12:03:27 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Egbert Krook : "Re: PHP compile hang on sparc64 using 3.2 (Maybe OT, long)"
Previous message: Andrew Basterfield: "Re: rc.local"
In reply to auto470779(at)hushmail.com: "Make Build on 3.2 failing"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 13:32:28 EDT

Do you need help?