Re: [Netatalk-admins] Netatalk Weirdness

On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Simon Bazley wrote:

> Well volunteered Ian,

Well, considering I've given MY free time to making Netatalk work on most of the architectures supported by OpenBSD, have tried submitting patches back in the 1.3beta series days to the netatalk developers. Lets see, Netatalk developers ignored my corrospondance. That's fine. That's the way they want to work, so most of the patches stayed in the OpenBSD ports repository.

Do I give a shit? No I don't. Am I going to continue to make this work for OpenBSD folk? Not anymore. Someone else can do it from now on. You all seem to have it under great control.

Have a nice life.

Ian McWilliam
Technical Officer
School of Computing & IT
University of Western Sydney.

"Technician was the lowest rank on this ship. even the man who changed the bog roll was higher than us." - Dave lister, Red Dwarf.

Scanned by SCIT E-Mail Gateway http://www.cit.uws.edu.au Received on Thu Dec 5 19:54:52 2002

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related openbsd.org Links advocacy announce bugs ipv6 misc ports ports-changes security-announce smp source-changes tech Request more information about Pantek