Re: RFC: gammu

On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Peter Varga wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 06:55:56PM +1100, Ian McWilliam wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Peter Varga wrote:
> >
>
> It is not the same source. Different bytecount is too abvious.

Yeah looks like some time between my download and yours, the distribution changed from 0.66 to 0.67.

Our proxy kept sending me the 0.66 version.

As I pointed out in my origional post to ports@ the naming of the distribution is going to be a pain. You've just experienced it. Naming the distribution gammu.tar.gz just sucks.

Now I'll have to port 0.67 and hope 0.68 doesn't emerge between testing, and committing, etc.

Yes I have asked the developer of gammu to rename the distro, but he is undecided and possibly not for it.

Stay tuned.

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related openbsd.org Links advocacy announce bugs ipv6 misc ports ports-changes security-announce smp source-changes tech Request more information about Pantek

Ian McWilliam
Technical Officer
School of Computing & IT
University of Western Sydney.

"Technician was the lowest rank on this ship. even the man who changed the bog roll was higher than us." - Dave lister, Red Dwarf.

Scanned by SCIT E-Mail Gateway http://www.cit.uws.edu.au Received on Thu Jan 30 21:51:56 2003