Change in wording for checksums don't match

From: Peter Hessler <phessler(at)theapt.org>
Date: Thu Feb 27 2003 - 11:15:29 EST

I made a trivial change to bsd.port.mk, which should add some safety for those who don't know any better. If you follow the recommedations of the ports tree, checksums don't really stop anything. My change advises the user to use REFETCH, which downloads from the OpenBSD main archive, rather than just use the non-checksummed file.

Hope this can be approved during the freeze.

Index: ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk

---

RCS file: /cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk,v retrieving revision 1.542
diff -u -r1.542 bsd.port.mk
--- ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk 2003/02/06 03:45:15 1.542 +++ ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk 2003/02/27 16:14:09 @@ -1488,8 +1488,9 @@

                        cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} refetch PROBLEMS="$$list"; \
                  else \
                        echo "Make sure the Makefile and checksum file ($$checksum_file)"; \
-                       echo "are up to date.  If you want to override this check, type"; \
-                       echo "\"make NO_CHECKSUM=Yes [other args]\"."; \

+                       echo "are up to date.  If you want to fetch a good copy of this"; \

+                       echo "file from the OpenBSD main archive type"; \


+                       echo "\"make REFETCH=true [other args]\"."; \


                        exit 1; \
                  fi; \
                fi ; \

Received on Thu Feb 27 11:17:06 2003