Re: Ports Submission Tracking for February

tree is closed but ... i'll chime in anyhow, this may be useful.

On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Liam Allen wrote:

> Ports Submitted but not committed for February :

> New aguri February 10, 2003 Jose Nazario

jim reported ok on mac68k, i tested on i386 and sparc, both were ok for me. working on a no_x11 flavor.

> New anjuta June 18, 2002 Jim Geovedi

worked ok when i tested them many months ago. haven't tested since the migration to propolice. are these still on the map?

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related openbsd.org Links advocacy announce bugs ipv6 misc ports ports-changes security-announce smp source-changes tech Request more information about Pantek

> New gtkyahoo May 17, 2002 Jim Geovedi

tested way back when, was ok. i386.

> New ifile September 16, 2002 Sam Smith

tested ok ... i386.

> New incrtcl October 16, 2002 Jose Nazario

never got any feedback ...

> New naim Apr 4, 2002 Lurene

tested way back when on i386 and sparc, had some terminal issues on non-i386/xterm ...

Do you need more help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related openbsd.org Links advocacy announce bugs ipv6 misc ports ports-changes security-announce smp source-changes tech Request more information about Pantek

> New poink February 24, 2003 Artur Skura

worked with author to try and fix this up. using i386.

> New Smalleiffel Mar 21, 2002 Vincent Derrien

started using this on i386. maybe has some file layout issues but otherwise was ok on i386.

> New tcpdpriv February 24, 2003 Nikolay Sturm

i should look at this one, i'm interested in this.

> New tik Oct 29, 2001 Armando Atienza, Jr.

tested on i386, offered up a patch to the author, no followup.

Can we help you?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related openbsd.org Links advocacy announce bugs ipv6 misc ports ports-changes security-announce smp source-changes tech Request more information about Pantek

> New xgraph September 16, 2002 Lurene Angela Grenier

tested ok way back when ... i386.

> RFC libsmi September 12, 2002 Margarida Sequeira

tested back when it came out, seemed ok. so much has changed since then, hard to say now. i386.

> Update flac February 24, 2003 Christian Weisgerber

tested 2nd update, passed all but 1 regression test (previous update failed 2).

> Update p0f February 24, 2003 Jose Nazario

no feedback, plz give some ...

Can't find what you're looking for?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related openbsd.org Links advocacy announce bugs ipv6 misc ports ports-changes security-announce smp source-changes tech Request more information about Pantek

liam, two questions:

• when will you age out some of these entries?
• how can we submit so you track this cleanly, ie subject lines and such ...

  ---

jose nazario, ph.d.			jose@monkey.org
					
http://www.monkey.org/~jose/