Hosting Provided By

Re: Less than happy about stunnel 4 in ports

From: Steve Shockley <steve.shockley(at)shockley.net>
Date: Sun Mar 02 2003 - 13:45:08 EST

> > Anyway this is not OpenBSD problem except it would have
> been nice if
> > both version would have been in the ports for a while.
>
> cd /usr/ports/*/stunnel && cvs -qz3 up -rOPENBSD_3_2 && make package

A better alternative might be to download it and put it in /usr/ports/myports or something, so it doesn't get clobbered by the next cvs checkout. Received on Sun Mar 2 13:50:15 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Andrew Basterfield: "Re: Less than happy about stunnel 4 in ports"
Previous message: Chris Giard: "Re: NEW: cyrus-imapd-2.1.12"
In reply to Han Boetes: "Re: Less than happy about stunnel 4 in ports"
Next in thread: Andrew Basterfield: "Re: Less than happy about stunnel 4 in ports"
Reply: Andrew Basterfield: "Re: Less than happy about stunnel 4 in ports"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 13:43:41 EDT