Re: libshout-2.0 and ices-0.3?

Nikolay Sturm wrote:
> > ices 0.3. They got completely ignored, making me wonder if the "how" I
> > submitted them was wrong ... I noticed some people use a certain
> No, that was ok. If you receive no feedback on a port, you most

Strangeness ... I find them very interesting. ;) I would've preferred ices2 and Vorbis streaming, which, I might add, works perfectly on OpenBSD, but that one's not ready for the ports tree, yet - CVS/snapshots only.

Anyhow, I hope no port submission comes unsolicited, and when I stumble over something nice that might be useful for more people than me alone, I'll submit.

> > layout in their ports submission mails that I couldn't find any

I think I neglected to give an URL ... it's http://www.icecast.org/

> > just wondering about how to improve things for the next time. :) )

Working on it. ;P ... e.g., the '@comment ' parts in PLIST are annoying me now, because I should've known earlier by reading bsd.port.mk(5) better. Sorry for that. :/

Do you need help?

In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related openbsd.org Links advocacy announce bugs ipv6 misc ports ports-changes security-announce smp source-changes tech Request more information about Pantek

Moritz Received on Fri Jul 25 21:09:18 2003