Re: double PF setup.

On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:43:52PM -0400, Rainbird329@netscape.net wrote:
> I have a question that I thought best suited to this list. If you think I should post it to misc instead let me know.

If you're routing this (and not using a big phat layer 2 bridge (RT1 setup with bridging)), then you need a smaller netmask on the 10.10.1.0 network. Is the Suit-ware thing running as a bridge? Unless you're adding stuff later, it might make comprehension easier later to use a /30 netmask on the "point-to-point" link.

That might solve problems you had with arp for remote networks on a local interface, as well. Do that, then just setup routes on FW1 so that it can reach the networks attached to RT1 (route add 10.3.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.1, etc) and you should be fine.

This is pretty simple, you shouldn't need a dynamic routing agent.

--Doug Received on Wed Apr 16 12:52:18 2003