|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [e2e] opening multiple TCP connections getting popular
From: Joe Touch <touch(at)ISI.EDU>
Date: Thu Aug 30 2007 - 01:07:00 EDT
Bob Briscoe wrote:
There have been other companies predicated on similar model - e.g., packeteer. The IETF doesn't do compliance verification, and doesn't issue seals of approval.
...
The issue isn't how many flows are fair. It's whether users can get around such notions by spawning processes, opening multiple sockets, etc. The transport layer is per-connection fair. If you want per user or per parent process fair, you need user/process IDs (which isn't what we have). That's not a protocol issue per se; it creeps deeply into the OS. It also begs the question of what fairness is - and whether you'll need biometrics to enforce this all the way to layers 8, 9, 10, 11, etc. in the stack ;-) If you want per-login fairness, or per port group, or per process group, you can enforce this through RFC2140-style aggregation. It seems like you're bothered by two problems:
Neither one is solvable at the transport layer. Joe
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Touch Sr. Network Engineer, USAF TSAT Space Segment
Postel Center Director & Research Assoc. Prof., USC/ISI
Received on Thu Aug 30 01:56:13 2007This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 29 2007 - 14:15:38 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||