|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [e2e] opening multiple TCP connections getting popular
From: Michael Welzl <michael.welzl(at)uibk.ac.at>
Date: Thu Aug 30 2007 - 02:18:15 EDT
Indeed > I personally think that the net mainly survives because That raises an interesting question: given the fact that different experimental high-speed TCP variants are already widely deployed, and given the fact that the Window Scaling option is not widely used (*), what would happen to the net in the scenario that you sketched of Japan, where fibre to the home is becoming more common, if people would start using the Window Scaling option? Is the net only stable because either your personal access link or the lack of this option limits your sending rate anyway?
Cheers,
(*) - cf. http://www.icir.org/tbit/TCPevolution-Mar2005.pdf - and we also persistently saw this behavior in PlanetLab Does anybody know if there's a generally known, agreed upon reason for not using Window Scaling? Google tells me that some broken routers can't handle it... but, interestingly, Wikipedia (via google :-) ) tells me that, since kernel version 2.6.8, the option is enabled in Linux by default, and that it's used (by default? don't know) in Vista... so what, are we already heading for trouble? Received on Thu Aug 30 02:58:03 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 29 2007 - 14:15:38 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||