Mailing List Archive For postfix-users@postfix.org Jul 2007 By Date

• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 20:34:44 EDT
  • Postfix 2.4 patchlevel 05 available Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 20:03:38 EDT
  • Postfix 2.3 patchlevel 12 available Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 19:58:15 EDT
  • Re: Is there a way to append the domain name to a standard username? Patrick - South Valley Internet 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 19:33:07 EDT
  • Re: Is there a way to append the domain name to a standard username? Jorey Bump 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 19:30:12 EDT
  • Re: lost connection after DATA. Resolved! Dehnert James Sr 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 19:16:04 EDT
  • Re: Is there a way to append the domain name to a standard username? Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 19:10:15 EDT
  • Is there a way to append the domain name to a standard username? Patrick - South Valley Internet 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 18:59:47 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question RW 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 18:38:21 EDT
  • Re: how to set up postfix smtp client to use SSL (port 465) Joe Harvell 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 18:32:01 EDT
  • Re: how to set up postfix smtp client to use SSL (port 465) Joe Harvell 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 17:45:04 EDT
  • Re: LDAP lookup failures with Postfix 2.3.4 Victor Duchovni 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 17:36:22 EDT
  • LDAP lookup failures with Postfix 2.3.4 Saulo Calixto Bonfim 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 17:30:55 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.4 patchlevel 04 available Victor Duchovni 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 17:21:27 EDT
  • Re: how to set up postfix smtp client to use SSL (port 465) Noel Jones 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 17:17:47 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.4 patchlevel 04 available Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 17:09:17 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Victor Duchovni 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 17:07:11 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question mouss 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 16:55:52 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Victor Duchovni 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 16:53:56 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Scott Kitterman 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 16:46:08 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Erwan David 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 16:41:58 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question mouss 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 16:25:10 EDT
  • how to set up postfix smtp client to use SSL (port 465) Joe Harvell 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 16:11:02 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Chris Horry 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 16:06:10 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Jorey Bump 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 16:03:24 EDT
  • Re: Sender address rejected - Sender domain blocked Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 15:25:23 EDT
  • Postfix 2.4 patchlevel 04 available Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 15:25:16 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question M. Fioretti 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 14:12:06 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Gene Rackow 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 12:49:45 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Peter Rabbitson 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 12:47:12 EDT
  • Re: Sender address rejected - Sender domain blocked Noel Jones 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 12:37:42 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 12:29:03 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Jorey Bump 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 12:24:06 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Udo Rader 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 12:09:14 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Gene Rackow 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 11:58:43 EDT
  • R: Sender address rejected - Sender domain blocked Bissio 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 11:52:45 EDT
  • Re: Sender address rejected - Sender domain blocked Darren Pilgrim 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 11:49:19 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Jorey Bump 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 11:47:31 EDT
  • Re: Sender address rejected - Sender domain blocked Udo Rader 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 11:43:44 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Udo Rader 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 11:42:46 EDT
  • Sender address rejected - Sender domain blocked Bissio 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 11:25:10 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question mouss 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 11:12:30 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Udo Rader 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 10:16:34 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question Jorey Bump 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 10:10:13 EDT
  • Re: SPF interoperability question mouss 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 09:59:48 EDT
  • Re: Return message to sender when message size limit exceed mouss 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 09:04:24 EDT
  • SPF interoperability question Peter Rabbitson 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 08:45:13 EDT
  • Re: OT: firewalls and their sideffects on MTAs Mark Martinec 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 08:23:50 EDT
  • OT: firewalls and their sideffects on MTAs Udo Rader 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 07:33:06 EDT
  • Re: PIX problems with DKIM header fields Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 07:31:29 EDT
  • Re: PIX problems with DKIM header fields Robert Schetterer 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 07:00:45 EDT
  • Re: PIX problems with DKIM header fields Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:50:05 EDT
  • Re: PIX problems with DKIM header fields Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:35:47 EDT
  • Re: Problem with EOM of the sendmail command Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:22:29 EDT
  • Re: PIX problems with DKIM header fields Mark Martinec 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:12:12 EDT
  • Re: Return message to sender when message size limit exceed 2S3I - COMPAIN Eric 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 05:53:09 EDT
  • Re: Return message to sender when message size limit exceed mouss 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 05:51:48 EDT
  • Problem with EOM of the sendmail command Bauer, Joseph 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 05:51:54 EDT
  • Re: Keep mail for unknown users mouss 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 05:18:05 EDT
  • Return message to sender when message size limit exceed 2S3I - COMPAIN Eric 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 05:06:18 EDT
  • Keep mail for unknown users vlvmware(at)free.fr 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 03:46:21 EDT
  • Re: Configuration question Jan P. Kessler 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 03:38:11 EDT
  • Re: Configuration question Kev 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 02:39:20 EDT
  • Configuration question Fredrik Dahlberg 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 02:12:02 EDT
  • Re: Transparent gateway? Kev 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 01:49:53 EDT
  • Transparent gateway? Joey 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 00:57:18 EDT
  • Re: Configuration Questions Noel Jones 
• Tue Jul 31 2007 - 00:28:48 EDT
  • Re: PIX problems with DKIM header fields Victor Duchovni 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 22:11:47 EDT
  • Re: unknown user Patrick - South Valley Internet 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 21:00:15 EDT
  • PATCH version 2: milter question Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 20:17:53 EDT
  • Re: unknown user Patrick - South Valley Internet 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 20:03:34 EDT
  • unknown user Patrick - South Valley Internet 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 19:40:28 EDT
  • Re: PATCH: milter question Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 19:03:45 EDT
  • PATCH: milter question Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 17:58:04 EDT
  • Re: PIX problems with DKIM header fields Jim Fenton 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 17:40:59 EDT
  • Re: installing postfix with mysql support Hamilton Vera 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 16:48:47 EDT
  • Re: find messages denied by remote server Listaccount 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 16:42:13 EDT
  • Re: Delay splitted in logfile Victor Duchovni 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 16:12:42 EDT
  • find messages denied by remote server Peter Van Lone 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 15:31:23 EDT
  • Re: milter question Jukka Salmi 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 15:29:41 EDT
  • Re: postfix redirect problem mouss 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 15:24:45 EDT
  • Re: milter question Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 14:46:27 EDT
  • Re: milter question Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 14:45:53 EDT
  • Re: Postcard trash Jorey Bump 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 13:33:12 EDT
  • Re: milter question Jukka Salmi 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 12:54:03 EDT
  • Re: POPbeforeSMTP Magnus Bäck 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 12:47:30 EDT
  • Re: postfix redirect problem Tony Earnshaw 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 12:39:28 EDT
  • Re: PATCH: poor SMTP/Milter performance over loopback (127.0.0.1 etc) Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 12:24:50 EDT
  • Re: PATCH: poor SMTP/Milter performance over loopback (127.0.0.1 etc) Victor Duchovni 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 12:18:37 EDT
  • postfix redirect problem Wim Bakker 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 12:11:12 EDT
  • Configuration Questions Shezaan Topiwala 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 12:13:36 EDT
  • POPbeforeSMTP Eric Frazier 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 11:55:21 EDT
  • Postcard trash Tony Earnshaw 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 11:39:17 EDT
  • Re: PATCH: poor SMTP/Milter performance over loopback (127.0.0.1 etc) Victor Duchovni 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 11:08:26 EDT
  • Re: PATCH: poor SMTP/Milter performance over loopback (127.0.0.1 etc) Mark Martinec 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 10:55:17 EDT
  • smtpd_helo_required Duracom Lists 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 10:44:17 EDT
  • Re: (fwd) Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? Victor Duchovni 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 10:40:11 EDT
  • RE: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? Brian Collins 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 10:22:03 EDT
  • Re: (fwd) Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? Tony Earnshaw 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 10:17:41 EDT
  • Re: Disable queue hashing Victor Duchovni 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 09:10:34 EDT
  • RE: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? Brian Collins 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 09:07:39 EDT
  • RE: (fwd) Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? Brian Collins 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 08:34:55 EDT
  • Re: PATCH: poor SMTP/Milter performance over loopback (127.0.0.1 etc) Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 08:10:00 EDT
  • Re: loop in aliases Stefan Palme 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 07:55:10 EDT
  • Re: PATCH: poor SMTP/Milter performance over loopback (127.0.0.1 etc) Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 07:04:58 EDT
  • Re: PATCH: poor SMTP/Milter performance over loopback (127.0.0.1 etc) Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:59:22 EDT
  • Re: loop in aliases mouss 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:58:11 EDT
  • Re: Message size limit per user [SMTP2] mouss 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 05:03:13 EDT
  • Re: PIX problems with DKIM header fields Mark Martinec 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 04:05:28 EDT
  • Re: PIX problems with DKIM header fields Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 03:26:36 EDT
  • Re: PATCH: poor SMTP/Milter performance over loopback (127.0.0.1 etc) Jose Marcio Martins da Cruz 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 02:51:47 EDT
  • installing postfix with mysql support Banyan He 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 02:44:31 EDT
  • loop in aliases Stefan Palme 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 02:24:24 EDT
  • Re: smtp auth postfix Alexandros G. Fragkiadakis 
• Mon Jul 30 2007 - 02:24:39 EDT
  • Re: Another small policy server question Cami Sardinha 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 19:40:25 EDT
  • Re: PIX problems with DKIM header fields Mark Martinec 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 18:30:24 EDT
  • Re: Disable queue hashing Michael Tokarev 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 14:59:23 EDT
  • PATCH: poor SMTP/Milter performance over loopback (127.0.0.1 etc) Wietse Venema 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 14:52:42 EDT
  • Re: (fwd) Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? Roger Marquis 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 12:36:02 EDT
  • Re: [tolga@ozses.net: Mailman / postfix?] mouss 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 12:22:05 EDT
  • [tolga@ozses.net: Mailman / postfix?] Tolga 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 12:12:01 EDT
  • Re: milter question Wietse Venema 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 11:54:26 EDT
  • milter question Jukka Salmi 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 11:17:16 EDT
  • Re: Possible bug in domain lookups Victor Duchovni 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 09:41:54 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? Tony Earnshaw 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 09:17:38 EDT
  • Re: Disable queue hashing Wietse Venema 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 09:12:28 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Wietse Venema 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 08:58:54 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Wietse Venema 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 07:36:24 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? Tony Earnshaw 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 05:43:34 EDT
  • Re: Disable queue hashing Magnus Bäck 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 05:42:15 EDT
  • Re: Possible bug in domain lookups Peter Rabbitson 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 05:35:49 EDT
  • Re: Disable queue hashing Peter Rabbitson 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 05:29:21 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? mouss 
• Sun Jul 29 2007 - 00:04:41 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Victor Duchovni 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 23:16:10 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Victor Duchovni 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 22:05:24 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Wietse Venema 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 21:48:02 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Wietse Venema 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 20:29:37 EDT
  • Re: smtp auth postfix Noel Jones 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 18:51:00 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? Roger Marquis 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 16:44:42 EDT
  • smtp auth postfix Payne 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 15:44:41 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Victor Duchovni 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 15:24:08 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? M. Fioretti 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 14:53:34 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? Tony Earnshaw 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 14:42:41 EDT
  • Re: send mail to multiple users mess-mate 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 14:06:21 EDT
  • Re: Disable queue hashing Victor Duchovni 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 13:04:02 EDT
  • Re: check order possibly not honored Noel Jones 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 12:43:51 EDT
  • Re: check order possibly not honored MrC 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 12:42:20 EDT
  • Re: Disable queue hashing Peter Rabbitson 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 12:24:59 EDT
  • Re: Possible bug in domain lookups Victor Duchovni 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 12:25:01 EDT
  • Re: Possible bug in domain lookups mouss 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 12:22:36 EDT
  • Re: Disable queue hashing Victor Duchovni 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 12:15:18 EDT
  • Re: check order possibly not honored Jon 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 11:53:26 EDT
  • Disable queue hashing Peter Rabbitson 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 10:36:34 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? M. Fioretti 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 09:25:58 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? Tony Earnshaw 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 09:24:57 EDT
  • Possible bug in domain lookups Peter Rabbitson 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 07:54:38 EDT
  • Re: reject_unknown_client different on different dokus Robert Schetterer 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 07:44:40 EDT
  • Re: reject_unknown_client different on different dokus Magnus Bäck 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 07:43:42 EDT
  • Re: reject_unknown_client different on different dokus mouss 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 07:39:21 EDT
  • Re: reject_unknown_client different on different dokus Robert Schetterer 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 07:31:51 EDT
  • Re: reject_unknown_client different on different dokus Magnus Bäck 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 07:27:30 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? mouss 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 07:21:40 EDT
  • Re: PDF spam - how to stop Robert Schetterer 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 07:19:50 EDT
  • reject_unknown_client different on different dokus Robert Schetterer 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 07:17:10 EDT
  • Re: Message size limit per user [SMTP2] Andrzej Adam Filip 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 07:16:50 EDT
  • Re: Message size limit per user [SMTP2] Andrzej Adam Filip 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 07:04:44 EDT
  • Re: send mail limits Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 07:02:09 EDT
  • Re: Postfix | Dovecot | LDAP (and perhaps qmail.schema) - running into a few issues Tony Earnshaw 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 05:51:37 EDT
  • Re: PDF spam - how to stop Laurent CARON 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 03:32:25 EDT
  • Re: qmail -> postfix Magnus Bäck 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 03:27:16 EDT
  • Re: Local Delivery of only a few users Magnus Bäck 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 03:30:04 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? M. Fioretti 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 00:45:59 EDT
  • RE: send mail thru HTTP proxy Brian Collins 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 00:35:50 EDT
  • RE: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? Brian Collins 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 00:26:53 EDT
  • Re: send mail thru HTTP proxy Victor Duchovni 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 00:25:17 EDT
  • Re: send mail thru HTTP proxy Victor Duchovni 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 00:09:28 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Victor Duchovni 
• Sat Jul 28 2007 - 00:03:01 EDT
  • Re: Another small policy server question Ronald F. Guilmette 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 23:56:42 EDT
  • LDAP lookup for relay_domains problem (again) Floyd Kan 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 22:17:04 EDT
  • Re: Message size limit per user [SMTP2] Adam Jacob Muller 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 20:04:18 EDT
  • Re: Another small policy server question Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 19:56:30 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 19:49:18 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 19:22:30 EDT
  • Re: Another small policy server question Matteo Niccoli 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 19:17:02 EDT
  • Re: send mail limits Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 18:54:51 EDT
  • send mail limits Michal Krajcirovic 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 18:46:30 EDT
  • qmail -> postfix Michal Krajcirovic 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 18:41:53 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Mark Martinec 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 18:45:51 EDT
  • Another small policy server question Ronald F. Guilmette 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 18:41:06 EDT
  • Local Delivery of only a few users Andrew Noonan 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 18:17:12 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? vg_us(at)hotmail.com 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 18:15:49 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Robert Schetterer 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 17:56:52 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? mouss 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 18:10:37 EDT
  • Re: send mail thru HTTP proxy foo 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 17:39:56 EDT
  • Re: using different hostname when sending mail mouss 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 17:22:47 EDT
  • Re: connect to 127.0.0.1 refused mouss 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 17:23:07 EDT
  • Re: connect to 127.0.0.1 refused Victor Duchovni 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 17:21:57 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Victor Duchovni 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 17:21:38 EDT
  • Re: send mail thru HTTP proxy mouss 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 17:20:28 EDT
  • Re: connect to 127.0.0.1 refused Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 17:08:02 EDT
  • Re: connect to 127.0.0.1 refused /dev/rob0 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 16:18:38 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing instead of rejecting? Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 16:10:53 EDT
  • Bouncing instead of rejecting? John Cunningham 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 15:42:53 EDT
  • Re: Use of policyd John Beaver 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 14:54:23 EDT
  • Re: PIX problems with DKIM header fields Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 14:49:57 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 14:48:00 EDT
  • More of spamassassin+amavisd question but... Justin Kim 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 14:43:13 EDT
  • Re: Use of policyd Alejandro Cabrera Obed 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 14:41:44 EDT
  • Re: PIX problems with DKIM header fields Victor Duchovni 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 14:38:41 EDT
  • Re: using different hostname when sending mail Victor Duchovni 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 14:30:06 EDT
  • using different hostname when sending mail elph 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 14:29:49 EDT
  • PIX problems with DKIM header fields Jim Fenton 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 14:28:20 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? M. Fioretti 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 14:13:58 EDT
  • send mail thru HTTP proxy foo 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 13:35:06 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Noel Jones 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 13:13:31 EDT
  • Re: Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? /dev/rob0 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 13:12:57 EDT
  • Re: A Thank you to the Developers for the Free Software Victor Duchovni 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 13:08:44 EDT
  • Re: TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Victor Duchovni 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 12:46:55 EDT
  • Re: connect to 127.0.0.1 refused Bryan Irvine 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 12:38:02 EDT
  • Re: A Thank you to the Developers for the Free Software Michael Katz 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 12:32:08 EDT
  • Re: connect to 127.0.0.1 refused mouss 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 12:16:19 EDT
  • Re: connect to 127.0.0.1 refused Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 11:59:02 EDT
  • Re: connect to 127.0.0.1 refused Bernhard D Rohrer 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 11:42:32 EDT
  • Re: Message size limit per user [SMTP2] Victor Duchovni 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 11:41:31 EDT
  • Re: Postfix + 2 amavis instances sends forwarded messages twice mouss 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 11:19:17 EDT
  • Re: Use of policyd John Beaver 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 10:52:46 EDT
  • Re: Use of policyd Alejandro Cabrera Obed 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 10:29:59 EDT
  • Re: local_recipient_maps: prevent the sender that the user does'nt exist David Brachet 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 10:20:53 EDT
  • Re: local_recipient_maps: prevent the sender that the user does'nt exist Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 10:12:13 EDT
  • Re: local_recipient_maps: prevent the sender that the user does'nt exist Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 10:09:52 EDT
  • Re: local_recipient_maps: prevent the sender that the user does'nt exist Erwan David 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 10:00:59 EDT
  • Re: local_recipient_maps: prevent the sender that the user does'nt exist David Brachet 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 09:35:10 EDT
  • Re: local_recipient_maps: prevent the sender that the user does'nt exist Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 09:23:58 EDT
  • local_recipient_maps: prevent the sender that the user does'nt exist David Brachet 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 09:17:35 EDT
  • Re: R: Email monitoring Udo Rader 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 09:02:36 EDT
  • Re: Postfix + 2 amavis instances sends forwarded messages twice Pavel Georgiev 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 09:00:40 EDT
  • R: Email monitoring Gianluca Culot 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 08:44:04 EDT
  • Re: connect to 127.0.0.1 refused mouss 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 08:47:10 EDT
  • Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4 via yum? M. Fioretti 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 08:18:44 EDT
  • Re: Email monitoring Udo Rader 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 08:12:53 EDT
  • Email monitoring Gianluca Culot 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 08:08:38 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Robert Schetterer 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 08:04:10 EDT
  • connect to 127.0.0.1 refused Bernhard D Rohrer 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 07:36:45 EDT
  • RE: relay_domains lookup ldap problem Floyd Kan 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 07:03:33 EDT
  • Re: Message size limit per user [SMTP2] Andrzej Adam Filip 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 06:40:43 EDT
  • Re: Postfix + 2 amavis instances sends forwarded messages twice mouss 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 06:32:26 EDT
  • Re: Multiple instances mouss 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 06:21:51 EDT
  • Re: Message size limit per user mouss 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 06:03:44 EDT
  • Re: Message size limit per user Andrzej Adam Filip 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 05:21:43 EDT
  • Postfix + 2 amavis instances sends forwarded messages twice Pavel Georgiev 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 05:01:28 EDT
  • RE: relay_domains lookup ldap problem Floyd Kan 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 04:46:44 EDT
  • Re: relay_domains lookup ldap problem Angelos Karageorgiou 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 04:43:41 EDT
  • Re: New principles of antispam mouss 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 04:35:37 EDT
  • Re: A few ideas to discuss about for struggling Spam mouss 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 04:15:18 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain mouss 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 03:38:35 EDT
  • Re: MySQL template with additional substitute Benjamin Schmidt 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 02:48:52 EDT
  • Re: Customize the 221 Bye message Julian Tang 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 01:53:23 EDT
  • A Thank you to the Developers for the Free Software Ow Mun Heng 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 00:52:38 EDT
  • Re: relay_domains lookup ldap problem Floyd Kan 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 00:26:40 EDT
  • Re: relay_domains lookup ldap problem Floyd Kan 
• Fri Jul 27 2007 - 00:03:31 EDT
  • Re: relay_domains lookup ldap problem Floyd Kan 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 23:53:22 EDT
  • Re: relay_domains lookup ldap problem Floyd Kan 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 22:18:56 EDT
  • Re: Multiple instances Duane Hill 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 21:28:39 EDT
  • User Bulletin implementable with Postfix Rick Kunkel 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 19:27:41 EDT
  • Re: Message size limit per user Rod Dorman 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 18:57:54 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Victor Duchovni 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 18:49:33 EDT
  • Re: Message size limit per user Andrzej Adam Filip 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 18:44:06 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Noel Jones 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 18:33:46 EDT
  • Re: TLS problem Victor Duchovni 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:10:45 EDT
  • Re: Message size limit per user Magnus Bäck 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 17:31:13 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Robert Schetterer 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 17:19:01 EDT
  • Re: Multiple instances Daniel L. Miller 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 16:55:05 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Bill Landry 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 16:37:29 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Robert Schetterer 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 16:34:25 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Robert Schetterer 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 16:20:16 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Noel Jones 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 16:14:10 EDT
  • Postfix | Dovecot | LDAP (and perhaps qmail.schema) - running into a few issues Patrick - South Valley Internet 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 16:07:16 EDT
  • Re: MySQL template with additional substitute mouss 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 15:57:04 EDT
  • Re: Spam Prevention and Cleanup mouss 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 15:54:00 EDT
  • Re: Question about Templates Patrick Ben Koetter 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 15:47:58 EDT
  • Re: Multiple instances mouss 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 15:50:02 EDT
  • Question about Templates Dominik Heeg 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 15:45:06 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain mouss 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 15:29:43 EDT
  • TCP_NODELAY, TCP_CORK, TCP_NOPUSH, etc (was: dkim-milter signing terribly slow...) Wietse Venema 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 15:15:48 EDT
  • Re: dkim-milter signing terribly slow with Postfix, but not with sendmail Mark Martinec 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 15:14:06 EDT
  • Re: Use of policyd John Beaver 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 15:12:45 EDT
  • Re: Use of policyd Duane Hill 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 15:03:31 EDT
  • Re: Spam Prevention and Cleanup Benjamin Schmidt 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 14:38:23 EDT
  • Use of policyd Alejandro Cabrera Obed 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 14:10:02 EDT
  • Re: dkim-milter signing terribly slow with Postfix, but not with sendmail Wietse Venema 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 13:54:38 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Wietse Venema 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 13:53:16 EDT
  • Re: dkim-milter signing terribly slow with Postfix, but not with sendmail Mark Martinec 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 13:34:38 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Shezaan Topiwala 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 13:13:58 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Robert Schetterer 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 13:11:40 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Wietse Venema 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 13:10:25 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Noel Jones 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 12:54:41 EDT
  • Re: mail log info clemens fischer 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 12:44:08 EDT
  • Spam Prevention and Cleanup Justin Kim 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 12:37:54 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Shezaan Topiwala 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 12:36:41 EDT
  • Re: Multiple instances Duane Hill 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 12:34:30 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Wietse Venema 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 12:32:39 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Shezaan Topiwala 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 12:31:42 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Robert Schetterer 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 12:07:15 EDT
  • Multiple instances Daniel L. Miller 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 12:04:45 EDT
  • Re: MySQL template with additional substitute Benjamin Schmidt 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:37:52 EDT
  • Re: dkim-milter signing terribly slow with Postfix, but not with sendmail Wietse Venema 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:33:35 EDT
  • Re: cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain mouss 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:05:57 EDT
  • cut out dkim sig via simple filter to buggy firewalled domain Robert Schetterer 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 10:57:19 EDT
  • Re: dkim-milter signing terribly slow with Postfix, but not with sendmail Mark Martinec 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 10:47:44 EDT
  • Re: How to filter emails based on both To: and From: mouss 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 10:39:52 EDT
  • Re: VRFY to verify destination accounts Alvaro Marín 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 10:35:24 EDT
  • dkim-milter signing terribly slow with Postfix, but not with sendmail Mark Martinec 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 08:50:01 EDT
  • Re: misdelivery of mail to user@virtual to user@domain LuKreme 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 08:42:17 EDT
  • Re: How to retire a domain name LuKreme 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 07:41:55 EDT
  • Re: How to filter emails based on both To: and From: Robert Schetterer 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 07:36:53 EDT
  • Re: How to filter emails based on both To: and From: Robert Schetterer 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 07:33:11 EDT
  • Re: How to filter emails based on both To: and From: Robert Schetterer 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 07:30:30 EDT
  • Re: How to filter emails based on both To: and From: Jan P. Kessler 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 06:08:22 EDT
  • Re: relay_domains lookup ldap problem Magnus Bäck 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 05:59:14 EDT
  • Re: How to filter emails based on both To: and From: Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 05:54:57 EDT
  • TLS problem Jordi Espasa Clofent 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 05:00:05 EDT
  • Re: RELAYING mouss 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 04:56:03 EDT
  • Re: smtpd_client_restrictions help mouss 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 04:51:42 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read mouss 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 04:30:56 EDT
  • Re: relay_domains lookup ldap problem Angelos Karageorgiou 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 03:43:01 EDT
  • Re: 2 instances of smtpd in master.cf Danny Kjærgaard 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 03:33:17 EDT
  • RE: relay_domains lookup ldap problem Floyd Kan 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 02:15:38 EDT
  • Re: how to delete mails older than 1 day without bounce ram 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 00:42:21 EDT
  • Re: setting up virtual domains Chris 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 00:31:16 EDT
  • Re: setting up virtual domains Victor Duchovni 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 00:15:30 EDT
  • Re: relay_domains lookup ldap problem Victor Duchovni 
• Thu Jul 26 2007 - 00:09:53 EDT
  • setting up virtual domains Chris 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 23:14:52 EDT
  • Re: smtpd_client_restrictions help flwong(at)eads.com.my 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 23:02:07 EDT
  • RELAYING Homer Wilson Smith 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 22:33:54 EDT
  • relay_domains lookup ldap problem Floyd Kan 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 19:47:03 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Wietse Venema 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 19:37:19 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Shezaan Topiwala 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 19:29:33 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Wietse Venema 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 18:37:56 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Shezaan Topiwala 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:49:41 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Wietse Venema 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:37:27 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Shezaan Topiwala 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:29:45 EDT
  • Re: VRFY to verify destination accounts mouss 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:22:25 EDT
  • Re: VRFY to verify destination accounts Duane Hill 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:09:36 EDT
  • VRFY to verify destination accounts Alvaro Marín 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:00:21 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Wietse Venema 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:56:30 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Shezaan Topiwala 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:46:35 EDT
  • Re: smtpd_client_restrictions help mouss 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:37:56 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read mouss 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:35:52 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Victor Duchovni 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:32:05 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Wietse Venema 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:15:27 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Shezaan Topiwala 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:02:38 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Daniel L. Miller 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 15:59:13 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Wietse Venema 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 15:37:00 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Shezaan Topiwala 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 15:17:16 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Victor Duchovni 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 15:07:28 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Shezaan Topiwala 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 14:34:39 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Victor Duchovni 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 14:24:52 EDT
  • Alias file not read Shezaan Topiwala 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 13:54:53 EDT
  • Re: Alias file not read Victor Duchovni 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 13:49:34 EDT
  • Alias file not read Shezaan Topiwala 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 13:08:04 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? mouss 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:58:33 EDT
  • Re: 2 instances of smtpd in master.cf mouss 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:45:13 EDT
  • Re: Maximum length of a header line? Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:42:26 EDT
  • Re: sender verify callout Wietse Venema 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:40:51 EDT
  • Re: sender verify callout mouss 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:28:19 EDT
  • Re: Maximum length of a header line? Victor Duchovni 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:23:02 EDT
  • Re: Maximum length of a header line? Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:20:21 EDT
  • Re: Maximum length of a header line? Victor Duchovni 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:16:21 EDT
  • Re: sender verify callout Jorey Bump 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 11:50:13 EDT
  • Re: importing the mails into database /dev/rob0 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 11:44:47 EDT
  • sender verify callout Joey 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 11:36:23 EDT
  • Re: Block an authenticated SASL user to send mail Noel Jones 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 11:22:59 EDT
  • Re: how to delete mails older than 1 day without bounce Noel Jones 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 11:10:52 EDT
  • Re: How to retire a domain name Benjamin Schmidt 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 10:48:09 EDT
  • How to retire a domain name Jon McWilliams 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 10:22:04 EDT
  • Re: postfix + ldap + gnarwl problem Wietse Venema 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 10:17:50 EDT
  • Re: Maximum length of a header line? Tony Earnshaw 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 10:15:24 EDT
  • Re: importing the mails into database Duane Hill 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 10:07:53 EDT
  • Re: importing the mails into database Benjamin Schmidt 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 10:05:05 EDT
  • Re: how to delete mails older than 1 day without bounce Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 10:03:54 EDT
  • Re: how to delete mails older than 1 day without bounce Banyan He 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 10:02:35 EDT
  • Re: importing the mails into database Banyan He 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 09:56:11 EDT
  • Re: postfix + ldap + gnarwl problem Nick Celebic 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 09:48:43 EDT
  • Re: postfix + ldap + gnarwl problem Wietse Venema 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 09:47:13 EDT
  • how to delete mails older than 1 day without bounce ram 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 09:28:05 EDT
  • Block an authenticated SASL user to send mail Lars Johansen 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 09:15:02 EDT
  • postfix + ldap + gnarwl problem Nick Celebic 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 09:07:59 EDT
  • Re: importing the mails into database Listaccount 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 08:11:35 EDT
  • importing the mails into database Banyan He 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:58:06 EDT
  • Re: Maximum length of a header line? Wietse Venema 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:28:50 EDT
  • Re[2]: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? Gerard 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:13:16 EDT
  • Re[2]: spamcop link to my website in signature leads to spam url advertise miracle / cleared Gerard 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 06:59:52 EDT
  • Re: Maximum length of a header line? Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 06:57:46 EDT
  • Re: Customize the 221 Bye message Wietse Venema 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 06:50:37 EDT
  • Re: spamcop link to my website in signature leads to spam url advertise miracle / cleared Robert Schetterer 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 06:49:48 EDT
  • Re: Maximum length of a header line? Wietse Venema 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 06:35:26 EDT
  • Re: 2 instances of smtpd in master.cf Danny Kjærgaard 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 06:32:45 EDT
  • smtpd_client_restrictions help flwong(at)eads.com.my 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 05:57:25 EDT
  • Maximum length of a header line? Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 05:17:40 EDT
  • Re: Delay splitted in logfile Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 05:06:43 EDT
  • Delay splitted in logfile Xesc Arbona 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 05:05:35 EDT
  • Re: spamcop link to my website in signature leads to spam url advertise miracle / cleared mouss 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 04:52:17 EDT
  • Re: 2 instances of smtpd in master.cf mouss 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 05:03:27 EDT
  • Re: misdelivery of mail to user@virtual to user@domain mouss 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 04:01:48 EDT
  • Re: Customize the 221 Bye message Magnus Bäck 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 03:05:28 EDT
  • Re: 2 instances of smtpd in master.cf Danny Kjærgaard 
• Wed Jul 25 2007 - 02:15:34 EDT
  • Customize the 221 Bye message Julian Tang 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 20:47:52 EDT
  • Postfix snapshot 20070724 Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 19:46:03 EDT
  • Re: relay access denied LuKreme 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 18:57:18 EDT
  • Re: misdelivery of mail to user@virtual to user@domain Gary Casterline 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 18:20:45 EDT
  • Re: spamcop link to my website in signature leads to spam url advertise miracle / cleared Robert Schetterer 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 17:43:53 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? steeeeeveee(at)gmx.net 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 17:28:52 EDT
  • Re: Possible DoS when the adress and the virtual mysql transport table's characterset mismatches? steeeeeveee(at)gmx.net 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 17:25:38 EDT
  • Re: relay access denied Noel Jones 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 17:17:38 EDT
  • Re: relay access denied Robert Schetterer 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:56:47 EDT
  • relay access denied LuKreme 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:49:13 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? mouss 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:38:16 EDT
  • Re: Possible DoS when the adress and the virtual mysql transport table's characterset mismatches? Leandro Santi 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:33:12 EDT
  • Re: Possible DoS when the adress and the virtual mysql transport table's characterset mismatches? Victor Duchovni 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:25:32 EDT
  • Re: Possible DoS when the adress and the virtual mysql transport table's characterset mismatches? steeeeeveee(at)gmx.net 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:23:56 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Mark Martinec 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:19:59 EDT
  • Re: Possible DoS when the adress and the virtual mysql transport table's characterset mismatches? Victor Duchovni 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:17:42 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? steeeeeveee(at)gmx.net 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:14:48 EDT
  • Re: Possible DoS when the adress and the virtual mysql transport table's characterset mismatches? Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:05:48 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? mouss 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:05:10 EDT
  • Re: Possible DoS when the adress and the virtual mysql transport table's characterset mismatches? steeeeeveee(at)gmx.net 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:04:37 EDT
  • spamcop link to my website in signature leads to spam url advertise miracle Robert Schetterer 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:00:02 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? mouss 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 15:38:37 EDT
  • Re: chaining aliases failing? mouss 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 15:26:27 EDT
  • Re: Message size limit per user mouss 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 15:22:56 EDT
  • Re: misdelivery of mail to user@virtual to user@domain mouss 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:53:10 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Victor Duchovni 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:46:08 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:42:59 EDT
  • Re: chaining aliases failing? Andrew Noonan 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:30:33 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Victor Duchovni 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:28:05 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:12:53 EDT
  • Re: chaining aliases failing? Magnus Bäck 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:12:46 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:08:57 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Rod Dorman 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:49:31 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:48:09 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Mark Martinec 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:36:53 EDT
  • Message size limit per user Alejandro Cabrera Obed 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:39:59 EDT
  • chaining aliases failing? anoonan(at)indeed.com 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:31:26 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) ghe 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:29:47 EDT
  • Re: queue behavior Victor Duchovni 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:29:11 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:28:40 EDT
  • misdelivery of mail to user@virtual to user@domain Gary Casterline 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:26:14 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Victor Duchovni 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:24:26 EDT
  • Re: queue behavior Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:23:18 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:15:13 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Mark Martinec 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:03:02 EDT
  • Re: queue behavior Pavel Urban 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:00:39 EDT
  • Re: Vacation Message - request for comment on implementation mouss 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 12:44:46 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 12:37:47 EDT
  • Re: qpsmtpd support service for postfix Tek Bahadur Limbu 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 12:31:00 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Mark Martinec 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 11:18:27 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Rod Dorman 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 10:47:43 EDT
  • Re: Possible DoS when the adress and the virtual mysql transport table's characterset mismatches? Leandro Santi 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 10:24:03 EDT
  • Re: 2 instances of smtpd in master.cf mouss 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 10:07:43 EDT
  • Vacation Message - request for comment on implementation Charles Marcus 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 09:36:47 EDT
  • Re: Possible DoS when the adress and the virtual mysql transport table's characterset mismatches? Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 09:24:35 EDT
  • Possible DoS when the adress and the virtual mysql transport table's characterset mismatches? Horváth Róbert 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:39:34 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:33:09 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:31:54 EDT
  • Re: Authentication: how does it work? David Brachet 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:13:18 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Mark Martinec 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:11:10 EDT
  • Re: diskless client with link to servers mailqueue Benjamin Schmidt 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:11:01 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? Jorey Bump 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:05:31 EDT
  • Re: Authentication: how does it work? Benjamin Schmidt 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:09:54 EDT
  • Postfix + Dovecot + Procmail Barbara M. 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:08:52 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 07:54:27 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 07:44:55 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 07:17:00 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation Angelos Karageorgiou 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 07:04:39 EDT
  • Re: PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 06:58:54 EDT
  • PIX header truncation (was: pix workaround broken) Wietse Venema 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 05:44:02 EDT
  • Re: Authentication: how does it work? Patrick Ben Koetter 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 05:41:46 EDT
  • 2 instances of smtpd in master.cf Danny Kjærgaard 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 05:39:53 EDT
  • diskless client with link to servers mailqueue Sascha Hüdepohl 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 05:33:07 EDT
  • Authentication: how does it work? David Brachet 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 05:30:05 EDT
  • Re: /usr/lib/sendmail delivery status/message id's (postdrop) Jacqui caren 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 04:26:41 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 03:48:55 EDT
  • uupth or pathto in Postfix Daniel Spannbauer 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 03:55:06 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? Dave McGuire 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 03:54:01 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Angelos Karageorgiou 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 03:48:26 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? Steven Wayne 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 03:29:09 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Angelos Karageorgiou 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 03:23:57 EDT
  • Re: a mail autoresponder with postfix+ldap. Angelos Karageorgiou 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 03:18:53 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? Dave McGuire 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 03:15:02 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? Dave McGuire 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 02:56:08 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Tue Jul 24 2007 - 01:50:07 EDT
  • Re: SASL and NIS errors Tony Earnshaw 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 23:05:24 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? Adam Jacob Muller 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 21:05:44 EDT
  • Re: SASL and NIS errors Victor Duchovni 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 20:52:08 EDT
  • SASL and NIS errors Patrick - South Valley Internet 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 21:54:24 EDT
  • postfix sqlite ?? JC Júnior 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 18:20:43 EDT
  • Re: pix workaround broken? Robert Schetterer 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 18:09:39 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? Magnus Bäck 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 18:01:30 EDT
  • Re: pix workaround broken? Robert Schetterer 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 17:59:13 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? Dave McGuire 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 17:55:12 EDT
  • Re: Problem authenticating postfix users with cyrus sasl saslauthd: unable to open Berkeley db /etc/sasldb2: No such file or directory Patrick Ben Koetter 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 17:48:29 EDT
  • Re: pix workaround broken? Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 17:43:27 EDT
  • Re: pix workaround broken? Noel Jones 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 17:42:38 EDT
  • Problem authenticating postfix users with cyrus sasl saslauthd: unable to open Berkeley db /etc/sasldb2: No such file or directory Denis Maggiorotto 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 17:38:06 EDT
  • Re: empty_address_recipient not mapped by virtual or alias Alain Spineux 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 17:28:32 EDT
  • Re: postconf not displaying all options Alain Spineux 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 17:27:32 EDT
  • Re: pix workaround broken? Robert Schetterer 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 17:26:42 EDT
  • Re: sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? Magnus Bäck 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 17:17:50 EDT
  • sender address verification vs. script-generated messages? Dave McGuire 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 17:09:37 EDT
  • Re: pix workaround broken? Noel Jones 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 16:48:01 EDT
  • Re: postconf not displaying all options Victor Duchovni 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 16:44:38 EDT
  • Re: pix workaround broken? Robert Schetterer 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 16:25:31 EDT
  • Re: pix workaround broken? Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 16:24:30 EDT
  • Re: postconf not displaying all options Magnus Bäck 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 16:23:55 EDT
  • Re: postconf not displaying all options Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 16:18:16 EDT
  • postconf not displaying all options Alain Spineux 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 16:15:58 EDT
  • Re: /usr/lib/sendmail delivery status/message id's (postdrop) Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 16:11:17 EDT
  • Re: /usr/lib/sendmail delivery status/message id's (postdrop) Victor Duchovni 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:59:35 EDT
  • Re: Strange From: in headers Laurent CARON 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:45:14 EDT
  • Re: stop smtp from anyone unless sasl auth? Duane Hill 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:40:18 EDT
  • Re: Strange From: in headers Laurent CARON 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:38:08 EDT
  • Re: Strange From: in headers Noel Jones 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:37:01 EDT
  • Re: stop smtp from anyone unless sasl auth? Jordan Tardif 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:09:38 EDT
  • Re: /usr/lib/sendmail delivery status/message id's (postdrop) clemens fischer 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:25:40 EDT
  • Re: stop smtp from anyone unless sasl auth? Victor Duchovni 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:19:59 EDT
  • Re: Strange From: in headers Laurent CARON 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:17:15 EDT
  • Re: stop smtp from anyone unless sasl auth? Justin McAleer 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:00:33 EDT
  • Re: pix workaround broken? Mark Martinec 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 14:13:35 EDT
  • Re: Strange From: in headers Laurent CARON 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 14:08:53 EDT
  • Re: Strange From: in headers Noel Jones 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 14:06:37 EDT
  • Re: empty_address_recipient not mapped by virtual or alias Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 14:02:58 EDT
  • empty_address_recipient not mapped by virtual or alias Alain Spineux 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 13:58:36 EDT
  • stop smtp from anyone unless sasl auth? Jordan Tardif 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 13:58:10 EDT
  • Re: Strange From: in headers Laurent CARON 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 13:50:32 EDT
  • Re: Strange From: in headers Laurent CARON 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 13:48:18 EDT
  • Re: queue behavior Victor Duchovni 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 13:47:27 EDT
  • Re: Strange From: in headers Noel Jones 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 13:40:46 EDT
  • Re: /usr/lib/sendmail delivery status/message id's (postdrop) Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 13:40:08 EDT
  • Strange From: in headers Laurent CARON 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 13:21:59 EDT
  • Re: qpsmtpd support service for postfix Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 13:16:58 EDT
  • Re: 'piped' aliases & DSNs Victor Duchovni 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 13:04:03 EDT
  • Re: qpsmtpd support service for postfix Victor Duchovni 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 12:44:07 EDT
  • 'piped' aliases & DSNs Jeff McCombs 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 12:41:03 EDT
  • Re: Strange From: in headers Noel Jones 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 12:08:57 EDT
  • Strange From: in headers Laurent CARON 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 11:07:47 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Patrick - South Valley Internet 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 11:04:53 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Patrick - South Valley Internet 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 11:03:06 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Patrick - South Valley Internet 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 10:38:56 EDT
  • Re: Mail - Access Denied Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 09:42:53 EDT
  • Re: a mail autoresponder with postfix+ldap. Nick Celebic 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 09:09:53 EDT
  • Re: Mail - Access Denied mouss 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 08:56:37 EDT
  • Re: X-Original-To after bcc contains wrong address Benjamin Schmidt 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 08:35:53 EDT
  • Re: Looking for a fail-over strategy for a mail server - Solved Jens E. Madsen Jr. 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 08:23:28 EDT
  • RE: Mail - Access Denied Peter Justus 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 08:19:52 EDT
  • Re: Mail - Access Denied Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 08:12:23 EDT
  • Mail - Access Denied Peter Justus 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 07:52:56 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 07:44:51 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 07:32:03 EDT
  • Re: /usr/lib/sendmail delivery status/message id's (postdrop) Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 07:29:30 EDT
  • Re: pix workaround broken? Wietse Venema 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 07:00:24 EDT
  • Re: pix workaround broken? Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 06:37:36 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Christopher E. Brown 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 06:37:13 EDT
  • Re: pix workaround broken? Robert Schetterer 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 05:48:14 EDT
  • qpsmtpd support service for postfix Tek Bahadur Limbu 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 05:15:23 EDT
  • pix workaround broken? Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 05:10:17 EDT
  • Re: /usr/lib/sendmail delivery status/message id's (postdrop) mouss 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 05:08:08 EDT
  • X-Original-To after bcc contains wrong address Benjamin Schmidt 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 05:06:46 EDT
  • Re: send mail to multiple users mouss 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 04:05:48 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Angelos Karageorgiou 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 03:22:02 EDT
  • /usr/lib/sendmail delivery status/message id's (postdrop) Jacqui caren 
• Mon Jul 23 2007 - 01:47:19 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Christopher E. Brown 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 22:16:25 EDT
  • RE: Postfix as backup MX for multiple servers. Dean Manners 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 19:23:15 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Julian Cowley 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 17:19:40 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Patrick - South Valley Internet 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 17:03:55 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 17:01:49 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? Matthias Andree 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 15:27:00 EDT
  • Re: Recommended Filesystems? mouss 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 14:14:15 EDT
  • Recommended Filesystems? Patrick - South Valley Internet 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 13:19:57 EDT
  • RE: outgoing rate control Juan Pablo Bagnon 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 13:03:25 EDT
  • Re: Mail going to backup server instead main server mouss 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 12:51:38 EDT
  • Re: Mail going to backup server instead main server Darrell Betts 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 12:41:39 EDT
  • Re: Mail going to backup server instead main server Alain Spineux 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 12:07:35 EDT
  • Re: Mail going to backup server instead main server Brett Dikeman 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 11:35:32 EDT
  • Re: Mail going to backup server instead main server Darrell Betts 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 09:55:24 EDT
  • Re: a mail autoresponder with postfix+ldap. Angelos Karageorgiou 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 09:16:07 EDT
  • Re: Mail going to backup server instead main server Wietse Venema 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 09:08:46 EDT
  • Re: Mail going to backup server instead main server Alain Spineux 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 08:52:49 EDT
  • Re: outgoing rate control Alain Spineux 
• Sun Jul 22 2007 - 08:35:13 EDT
  • Mail going to backup server instead main server Darrell Betts 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 20:46:53 EDT
  • Re: transport_maps: different behavior if discard or error is used Victor Duchovni 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 18:52:36 EDT
  • Re: Postfix as backup MX for multiple servers. Peter H. Coffin 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 15:48:02 EDT
  • Re: mail forwarding loop: how do I prevent this? mouss 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 13:27:00 EDT
  • Re: mail forwarding loop: how do I prevent this? Bill Weiss 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 11:11:47 EDT
  • outgoing rate control Juan Pablo Bagnon 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 10:32:29 EDT
  • Re: mail forwarding loop: how do I prevent this? Justin Piszcz 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 09:39:49 EDT
  • Re: Change error messages Wietse Venema 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 09:38:25 EDT
  • Re: transport_maps: different behavior if discard or error is used Wietse Venema 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 09:35:26 EDT
  • Re: mail forwarding loop: how do I prevent this? Wietse Venema 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 09:07:40 EDT
  • Re: Change error messages jakjr 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 09:01:56 EDT
  • Re: transport_maps: different behavior if discard or error is used Alain Spineux 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 08:38:17 EDT
  • Re: Server relaying existing virtual mailbox Jorge Lanza 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 08:32:22 EDT
  • Re: Server relaying existing virtual mailbox Jorge Lanza 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 07:47:47 EDT
  • Re: Server relaying existing virtual mailbox Magnus Bäck 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 07:39:13 EDT
  • Re: New principles of antispam Justin Piszcz 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 07:38:54 EDT
  • mail forwarding loop: how do I prevent this? Justin Piszcz 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 08:10:03 EDT
  • Re: Server relaying existing virtual mailbox Jorge Lanza 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 07:53:40 EDT
  • Server relaying existing virtual mailbox Jorge Lanza 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 07:01:08 EDT
  • Re: A few ideas to discuss about for struggling Spam ml 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 06:46:33 EDT
  • Re: New principles of antispam ml 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 06:40:58 EDT
  • Re: A few ideas to discuss about for struggling Spam ml 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 04:02:44 EDT
  • how can I rewrite the Mail From ram 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 01:01:19 EDT
  • Re: SMTP Transaction logs? Jeff McCombs 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 00:17:45 EDT
  • Re: Constant connections from user unknown sending spam MrC 
• Sat Jul 21 2007 - 00:13:43 EDT
  • Re: queue behavior Pavel Urban 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 23:41:53 EDT
  • Re: Constant connections from user unknown sending spam MrC 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 22:38:07 EDT
  • Constant connections from user unknown sending spam Kevin Brown 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 19:31:18 EDT
  • Re: transport_maps: different behavior if discard or error is used Noel Jones 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 18:07:08 EDT
  • Re: transport_maps: different behavior if discard or error is used Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 17:48:20 EDT
  • Re: transport_maps: different behavior if discard or error is used Alain Spineux 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 17:34:15 EDT
  • Re: Prevent specific user to authenticate in SASL/LDAP Alain Spineux 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 17:31:19 EDT
  • Re: sporadic deferrals Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 17:17:13 EDT
  • Re: transport_maps: different behavior if discard or error is used Noel Jones 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 17:04:45 EDT
  • sporadic deferrals Aaron Bennett 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 17:03:43 EDT
  • Re: backup mail server problems Alain Spineux 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 16:57:05 EDT
  • transport_maps: different behavior if discard or error is used Alain Spineux 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 16:31:50 EDT
  • Re: transport_maps is ignored Alain Spineux 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 16:20:13 EDT
  • Re: Address verification questions Chris Horry 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 16:01:51 EDT
  • Re: queue behavior Victor Duchovni 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 15:57:33 EDT
  • Re: Looking for a fail-over strategy for a mail server Victor Duchovni 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 15:52:35 EDT
  • Re: queue behavior Pavel Urban 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 15:30:47 EDT
  • Re: Address verification questions Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 15:30:15 EDT
  • Re: Address verification questions Noel Jones 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 15:27:09 EDT
  • Re: queue behavior Victor Duchovni 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 15:25:41 EDT
  • Re: SMTP Transaction logs? Victor Duchovni 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 14:54:51 EDT
  • Re: send mail to multiple users mess-mate 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 14:54:37 EDT
  • Address verification questions Chris Horry 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 14:02:05 EDT
  • RE: SMTP Transaction logs? Jeff McCombs 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:53:55 EDT
  • queue behavior Pavel Urban 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:47:48 EDT
  • Re: mails from servers with no PTR Brian A. Seklecki 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:27:48 EDT
  • Re: X-Original-To inconsistency martin f krafft 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:21:16 EDT
  • Re: X-Original-To inconsistency Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:15:46 EDT
  • X-Original-To inconsistency martin f krafft 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:15:37 EDT
  • Re: a mail autoresponder with postfix+ldap. Nick Celebic 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:14:24 EDT
  • Re: SMTP Transaction logs? Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:03:36 EDT
  • SMTP Transaction logs? Jeff McCombs 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 12:29:37 EDT
  • Re: Change error messages Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 12:27:56 EDT
  • Re: transport_maps is ignored Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 11:24:30 EDT
  • backup mail server problems Darrell Betts 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 11:02:16 EDT
  • Change error messages jakjr 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 11:01:40 EDT
  • transport_maps is ignored Alain Spineux 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 07:55:50 EDT
  • Re: mails from servers with no PTR Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 07:45:23 EDT
  • Re: Looking for a fail-over strategy for a mail server Wietse Venema 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 07:09:33 EDT
  • Re: mails from servers with no PTR mouss 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 06:24:28 EDT
  • Re: mails from servers with no PTR Pitshou Asingalembi Mbema 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 06:16:35 EDT
  • Re: mails from servers with no PTR Frederic 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 06:12:28 EDT
  • Re: mails from servers with no PTR Pitshou Asingalembi Mbema 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 05:58:57 EDT
  • Re: Customize postfix's answers Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 05:57:19 EDT
  • Re: mails from servers with no PTR Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 05:57:21 EDT
  • Re: Customize postfix's answers David Brachet 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 05:57:50 EDT
  • mails from servers with no PTR Frederic 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 05:43:03 EDT
  • Re: Customize postfix's answers Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 05:40:12 EDT
  • Customize postfix's answers David Brachet 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 05:14:07 EDT
  • Re: send mail to multiple users Alexandros G. Fragkiadakis 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 04:44:30 EDT
  • Re: transpot decision based on cyrus mailbox existence mouss 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 04:38:53 EDT
  • Re: send mail to multiple users mouss 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 04:33:24 EDT
  • Re: bounce notification of relayhost mouss 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 04:22:03 EDT
  • send mail to multiple users mess-mate 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 02:37:44 EDT
  • transpot decision based on cyrus mailbox existence Jack Bates 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 01:41:13 EDT
  • Re: Re: Postfix + SASL Problem Patrick Ben Koetter 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 01:30:24 EDT
  • Re: Postfix + SASL Problem Andreas Winkelmann 
• Fri Jul 20 2007 - 01:10:00 EDT
  • Re: bounce notification of relayhost Uwe Dippel 
• Thu Jul 19 2007 - 23:13:13 EDT
  • Re: force a bounce on a message in the queue Victor Duchovni 
• Thu Jul 19 2007 - 22:31:37 EDT
  • force a bounce on a message in the queue Joey 
• Thu Jul 19 2007 - 22:17:41 EDT
  • Re: Looking for a fail-over strategy for a mail server Wietse Venema 
• Thu Jul 19 2007 - 22:12:33 EDT
  • Re: milter does not work for 2nd message in the same connection Wietse Venema 
• Thu Jul 19 2007 - 21:49:02 EDT
  • Re: Looking for a fail-over strategy for a mail server Victor Duchovni 
• Thu Jul 19 2007 - 21:27:30 EDT
  • Re: milter does not work for 2nd message in the same connection Nerijus Baliunas 
• Thu Jul 19 2007 - 21:12:05 EDT
  • Re: Looking for a fail-over strategy for a mail server Jens E. Madsen Jr. 
• Thu Jul 19 2007 - 21:06:58 EDT
  • Re: Re: Postfix + SASL Problem Jeff Huang 
• Thu Jul 19 2007 - 20:57:27 EDT
  • Re: postfix/smtpd can works in tls wrapper mode,could postfix/smtp client be configured to send mail to this kind smtpd? Robbin Woo 
• Thu Jul 19 2007 - 18:16:06 EDT
  • Re: What causes: 421 Error: timeout exceeded (in reply to end of DATA command)) Wietse Venema