Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

Re: [ADMIN] reindexdb hangs

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt.com>
Date: Wed Sep 12 2007 - 16:30:28 EDT


Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > I am unsure if I should backpatch to 8.1: the code in cluster.c has
> > changed, and while it is relatively easy to modify the patch, this is a
> > rare bug and nobody has reported it in CLUSTER (not many people clusters
> > temp tables, it seems). Should I patch only REINDEX? How far back?
>
> I'd say go as far back as you can conveniently modify the patch for.
> This is a potential data-loss bug (even if only for temporary data)
> so we ought to take it seriously.

OK, I fixed it all the way back that it was needed: 7.4 for CLUSTER and 8.1 for REINDEX.

Before 7.4 there wasn't a database-wide version of CLUSTER. This wasn't a very serious bug in any case, because it would have thrown an ERROR if it tried to cluster a remote temp table. So apparently no one ever saw it, because I can't remember any report about it.

For REINDEX the story is very different, because what happens is that queries start silently returning wrong data. My test case was

alvherre=# create temp table foo (a int primary key); NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY creará el índice implícito «foo_pkey» para la tabla «foo» CREATE TABLE
alvherre=# insert into foo select * from generate_series(1,40000); INSERT 0 40000

  • "reindex database alvherre" in another session

alvherre=# select * from foo where a = 400;   a



(0 rows)

If you now REINDEX this table in the current session, it correctly returns one tuple. So if somebody is executing a procedure which involve temp tables and someone else concurrently does a REINDEX DATABASE, the queries of the first session are automatically corrupted. It seems like the worst kind of bug.

Maybe we need additional protections on the bufmgr to prevent this kind of problem.

Do you need help?X

We only introduced REINDEX DATABASE as a way to reindex user indexes in 8.1. Before that, it only considered system catalogs, which ISTM are never temp.

Many thanks to dx k9 for the original report.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                               
http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org/
"Endurecerse, pero jamás perder la ternura" (E. Guevara)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Received on Wed Sep 12 16:32:53 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 07 2007 - 12:15:55 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library