Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Dropping postgres as a whole.

From: Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt.com>
Date: Sat Sep 29 2007 - 12:55:03 EDT

Robert Treat wrote:

> On Friday 28 September 2007 13:18, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Brian Hurt wrote:
>>> Given the length of this thread, I vote for "Digres".
>> Except then it'll regularly get misspelled as Digress. And
>> pronounced Dee'-gray.
>>
>> I think we should call it Gerwuffle. Like, "Yeah, go install that
>> Gerwuffle over there, and twiddle the thingy, and you'll be set to
>> go."
>>
>> Or, of course, we can do what certain other parties with previous
>> renaming problems did. We can be The Database Formerly Known as
>> Postgres. Then when someone complains about confusion with the
>> PostQUEL-using version of the code, we can just become The Database.
>> That oughta clear up any confusion, eh?
>>

> 
> Then CMD could be "The" The Database Company. 
> 

Sold!

Joshua D. Drake

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------

TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

                
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Received on Sat Sep 29 12:55:19 2007