|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL Certification
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt.com>
Date: Mon Feb 04 2008 - 14:59:31 EST
> > Right, I believe that is a valid argument. I think the real > I would junk pgsql-sql, pgsql-ports, pgsql-performance, pgsql-novice I could see ports going to hackers but bugs should be a bug tracker that copies hackers or bugs. I could see eliminating -sql, -novice and -interfaces. -performance is a little bit tougher because it may be a -hacker issue or an -admin issue. Docs should absolutely be separate in order to keep the noise level down. > I would also suggest junking pgsql-advocacy and pgsql-www as well. Sorry but that isn't going to happen and pgsql-www is nowhere near just noise. It is vital to the operation of the infrastructure. > peripherally aware of and not allow to slip under the radar because Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political punditReceived on Mon Feb 4 15:01:09 2008 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 17 2008 - 04:54:02 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||