Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

Re: [GENERAL] "not in" clause too slow?

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana.org>
Date: Tue Sep 25 2007 - 04:59:09 EDT


On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 12:09:50PM +0200, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> 2) how can I speed it up? by using indexes? or by changing the query?

Note that NOT IN cannot be optimised in the same way as NOT EXISTS due to the different ways they handle NULL. In particular if the subquery of the NOT IN produces a NULL *anywhere* it will always return FALSE, hence it often needs to scan the entire subquery even when an index might be better. You might know this cannot happen, but postgres can't always tell. NOT EXISTS doesn't have this problem.

Blame the SQL standard if you like.

-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <
kleptog(at)svana.org>   
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
Received on Tue Sep 25 05:02:19 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 07 2007 - 11:50:49 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library