Re: [GENERAL] (Never?) Kill Postmaster?

Tom Lane wrote:
>> Ok, you wrote "Postgres will recover automatically", but could this take
>> several minutes?
>>
>
> Yeah, potentially. I don't suppose you have any idea how long it'd been
> since your last checkpoint, but what do you have checkpoint_timeout and
> checkpoint_segments set to?
>

I did not change these parameters from their default values, so checkpoint_timeout is 5 min and checkpoint_segments is 8.

> What I'd like to know about is why the child process was unresponsive to
> SIGINT in the first place. There's little we can do about long-running
> plpython functions, for instance, but if it was looping in Postgres
> proper then we should do something about that. Can you reproduce this
> problem easily?
>

Unfortunately not. I have tried the same query and it took only about 1 sec to complete. In fact, it's a simple seq scan with a single filter condition. No user defined functions are involved. Maybe it has something to do with the users connecting from their Windows machines to the PostgreSQL server using psqlodbc. On the other hand, it has not been the first time that such a user connection had to be terminated and we did never experience this problem. If I see the phenomenon again I will use strace or something similar to find out what the backend process is doing.

Regards,

    Christian

-- 
Deriva GmbH                         Tel.: +49 551 489500-42
Financial IT and Consulting         Fax:  +49 551 489500-91
Hans-Böckler-Straße 2                  
http://www.deriva.de
D-37079 Göttingen

Deriva CA Certificate: 
http://www.deriva.de/deriva-ca.cer



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               
http://archives.postgresql.org/