Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

Re: [GENERAL] very slow query

From: A. Kretschmer <andreas.kretschmer(at)schollglas.com>
Date: Wed Dec 12 2007 - 06:56:35 EST


am Wed, dem 12.12.2007, um 11:44:58 +0000 mailte Ashish Karalkar folgendes:
> Hi,
> I am having PostgreSQL 8.2.4 on Suse 10.3
>
> Server is not using the index insted it chooses to take seq scan path. table is
> having @ 120 million rows
>
> here is the output from planner:
> Nested Loop IN Join (cost=0.00..5030217.97 rows=2 width=106)
> -> Seq Scan on sms_new (cost=0.00..5027902.00 rows=384 width=106)
> Filter: (mobile = 919820920858::bigint)
> -> Index Scan using deliveryid_pkey on delivery (cost=0.00..6.02 rows=1
> width=8)
> Index Cond: ("outer".deliveryid = delivery.deliveryid)
> Filter: ((createddate > '2007-12-11 00:00:00'::timestamp without time
> zone) AND (createddate < '2007-12-11 21:00:00'::timestamp without time zone)
> AND ((keyword)::text = 'CRI'::text))
>
> column deliveryid has an index over it in sms_new table.
>
> can anybody please guide to force the usage of index

It's using an index on "deliveryid":
Index Scan using deliveryid_pkey

Do you have an index on "mobile"? Can you show us the table definition and the output from EXPLAIN ANALYSE?

Andreas

-- 
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt:  Heynitz: 035242/47150,   D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID:   0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA   
http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Received on Wed Dec 12 06:57:32 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 16 2008 - 22:01:27 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library