|
|||||||||||
|
[PERFORM] Tuning for warm standby
From: Kevin Kempter <kevin(at)kevinkempterllc.com>
Date: Thu Sep 27 2007 - 13:42:06 EDT
I'm preparing to fire up WAL archiving on 8 production servers We will follow up with implementing a warm standby scenariio. Does anyone have any thoughts per how to maximize performance, yet minimize the potential for data loss assuming we were not able to retrieve the final un-archived WAL segment from the original pg_xlog dir in the case of a crash? Specifically, I wonder if there are some general rules of thought per tuning wal_buffers, checkpoint_segments and friends...
Currently all servers have the following settings:
wal_buffers = 24
Thanks in advance /Kevin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
Received on Thu Sep 27 13:46:41 2007This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 08 2007 - 13:21:38 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||