Re: [PERFORM] Disable WAL completely

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck.ca>
Date: Tue Feb 19 2008 - 10:48:01 EST

On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:48:55PM +0000, Matthew wrote:
> If there's not much write traffic, the WAL won't be used much anyway.

You still have checkpoints.

> If you really don't care much about the integrity, then the best option is
> probably to put the WAL on ramfs.

Um, that will cause the WAL to go away in the event of device crash. Surely that's a bad thing?

A

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------

TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org Received on Tue Feb 19 10:51:27 2008