Mailing List Archive For pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Oct 2007 By Date

• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 23:53:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Ow Mun Heng 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 19:03:43 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Ericson Smith 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 19:00:51 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hardware and For PostgreSQL Paul Lambert 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 18:05:16 EDT
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans] Tom Lane 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 18:30:40 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hardware and For PostgreSQL Joshua D. Drake 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 17:22:19 EDT
  • [Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans] Sami Dalouche 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 18:01:34 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hardware and For PostgreSQL Ron St-Pierre 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 17:58:57 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Tomas Vondra 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 17:54:26 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Kevin Grittner 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 16:15:34 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] tables with 300+ partitions Pablo Alcaraz 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 14:54:51 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hardware and For PostgreSQL Joe Uhl 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 15:15:52 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Arjen van der Meijden 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 15:27:07 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Magnus Hagander 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 13:57:17 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] tables with 300+ partitions Scott Marlowe 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 13:24:13 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hardware and For PostgreSQL Ben 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 12:45:08 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Ketema 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 13:57:28 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] tables with 300+ partitions Tomáš Vondra 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 13:03:21 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] tables with 300+ partitions Steven Flatt 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 14:19:49 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hardware and For PostgreSQL Scott Marlowe 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 11:53:17 EDT
  • [PERFORM] hardware and For PostgreSQL Ketema Harris 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 11:27:42 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] tables with 300+ partitions Pablo Alcaraz 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 10:16:13 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Luke Lonergan 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 05:39:24 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Two fast queries get slow when combined cluster 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 05:37:24 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Two fast queries get slow when combined cluster 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 04:43:57 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Optimizing PostgreSQL for Windows Christian Rengstl 
• Wed Oct 31 2007 - 00:05:42 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Two fast queries get slow when combined Tom Lane 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 17:46:45 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Two fast queries get slow when combined Heikki Linnakangas 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 16:48:16 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Two fast queries get slow when combined cluster 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 17:00:10 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] tables with 300+ partitions Steven Flatt 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 15:21:05 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Optimizing PostgreSQL for Windows Guillaume Lelarge 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 14:56:50 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] tables with 300+ partitions Heikki Linnakangas 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 14:09:05 EDT
  • [PERFORM] tables with 300+ partitions Pablo Alcaraz 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 12:41:00 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Improving Query Ketema Harris 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 11:13:15 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Optimizing PostgreSQL for Windows Dave Dutcher 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 11:39:12 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Improving Query Tom Lane 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 10:21:03 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Optimizing PostgreSQL for Windows Marc Schablewski 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 10:15:34 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Improving Query Ketema Harris 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 09:42:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Improving Query Ketema Harris 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 09:31:46 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Improving Query Michael Glaesemann 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 09:28:27 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Optimizing PostgreSQL for Windows Christian Rengstl 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 09:23:39 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Improving Query Richard Huxton 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 08:18:57 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Improving Query Ketema 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 05:06:21 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Gregory Stark 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 04:20:24 EDT
  • [PERFORM] High Availability and Load Balancing ruben(at)rentalia.com 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 01:54:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Tom Lane 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 01:46:22 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Mark Kirkwood 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 01:19:42 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Suggestions on an update query Scott Marlowe 
• Tue Oct 30 2007 - 01:06:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Luke Lonergan 
• Mon Oct 29 2007 - 12:33:57 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Suggestions on an update query Campbell, Lance 
• Mon Oct 29 2007 - 11:22:07 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Append Cost in query planners Heikki Linnakangas 
• Mon Oct 29 2007 - 09:40:39 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Gregory Stark 
• Mon Oct 29 2007 - 07:55:51 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Append Cost in query planners Nimesh Satam 
• Mon Oct 29 2007 - 07:28:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans Cédric Villemain 
• Mon Oct 29 2007 - 07:40:05 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Append Cost in query planners Heikki Linnakangas 
• Mon Oct 29 2007 - 07:11:51 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans Richard Huxton 
• Mon Oct 29 2007 - 07:09:16 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Append Cost in query planners Nimesh Satam 
• Mon Oct 29 2007 - 05:48:14 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans Dimitri Fontaine 
• Sun Oct 28 2007 - 19:45:14 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans Tom Lane 
• Sun Oct 28 2007 - 18:55:46 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans Sami Dalouche 
• Sun Oct 28 2007 - 18:08:34 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans Tom Lane 
• Sun Oct 28 2007 - 17:25:10 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans Sami Dalouche 
• Sun Oct 28 2007 - 14:22:04 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Append Cost in query planners Heikki Linnakangas 
• Sun Oct 28 2007 - 13:27:24 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1 Simon Riggs 
• Sun Oct 28 2007 - 12:53:59 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1 Tom Lane 
• Sun Oct 28 2007 - 11:38:15 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Append Cost in query planners Heikki Linnakangas 
• Sun Oct 28 2007 - 11:22:53 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Append Cost in query planners Nimesh Satam 
• Sun Oct 28 2007 - 05:13:53 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1 Simon Riggs 
• Sat Oct 27 2007 - 20:20:26 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Gregory Stark 
• Sat Oct 27 2007 - 18:31:18 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Speed difference between select ... union select ... and select from partitioned_table Pablo Alcaraz 
• Sat Oct 27 2007 - 17:48:16 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1 Luke Lonergan 
• Sat Oct 27 2007 - 17:31:22 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Simon Riggs 
• Sat Oct 27 2007 - 17:26:49 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Speed difference between select ... union select ... and select from partitioned_table Simon Riggs 
• Sat Oct 27 2007 - 15:28:04 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Luke Lonergan 
• Sat Oct 27 2007 - 15:12:06 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Luke Lonergan 
• Sat Oct 27 2007 - 09:15:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Speed difference between select ... union select ... and select from partitioned_table Tom Lane 
• Sat Oct 27 2007 - 05:11:32 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Heikki Linnakangas 
• Sat Oct 27 2007 - 04:53:30 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Anton 
• Sat Oct 27 2007 - 01:37:29 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Tom Lane 
• Sat Oct 27 2007 - 01:14:21 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Speed difference between select ... union select ... and select from partitioned_table Pablo Alcaraz 
• Sat Oct 27 2007 - 00:26:21 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Anton 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 22:31:11 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Suggestions on an update query Joshua D. Drake 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 22:04:47 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Suggestions on an update query Gregory Stark 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 17:45:19 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Jignesh K. Shah 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 17:15:47 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Suggestions on an update query Joshua D. Drake 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 17:12:37 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Speed difference between select ... union select ... and select from partitioned_table Gregory Stark 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 17:10:15 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Speed difference between select ... union select ... and select from partitioned_table Pablo Alcaraz 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 17:09:20 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Suggestions on an update query Gregory Stark 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 17:07:01 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Speed difference between select ... union select ... and select from partitioned_table Jeff Davis 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 16:37:40 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Speed difference between select ... union select ... and select from partitioned_table Pablo Alcaraz 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 16:31:44 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Suggestions on an update query Campbell, Lance 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 16:26:46 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Suggestions on an update query Campbell, Lance 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 15:08:16 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Tom Lane 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 12:46:14 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Jignesh K. Shah 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 11:45:26 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Jignesh K. Shah 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 11:08:07 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Bunching "transactions" Greg Smith 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 10:12:53 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Bunching "transactions" Jean-David Beyer 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 09:36:53 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Jignesh K. Shah 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 09:25:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Jignesh K. Shah 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 09:20:36 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Jignesh K. Shah 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 09:04:43 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Bunching "transactions" Jean-David Beyer 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 08:41:36 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Finalizing commit taking very long Giulio Cesare Solaroli 
• Fri Oct 26 2007 - 04:07:23 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Gregory Stark 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 23:26:08 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Tom Lane 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 22:56:56 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Josh Berkus 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 20:51:07 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Tom Lane 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 18:43:52 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Gregory Stark 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 18:37:33 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Gregory Stark 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 16:46:46 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Bunching "transactions" Chris Browne 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 16:54:01 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Tom Lane 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 10:04:56 EDT
  • [PERFORM] PostgreSQL 8.3beta1 on Solaris testing case study Jignesh K. Shah 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 16:24:18 EDT
  • [PERFORM] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Jignesh K. Shah 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 15:15:31 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Bunching "transactions" Jean-David Beyer 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 13:55:23 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Bunching "transactions" Chris Browne 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 12:21:53 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Bunching "transactions" Tom Lane 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 12:06:11 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Bunching "transactions" Heikki Linnakangas 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 11:30:08 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Bunching "transactions" Jean-David Beyer 
• Thu Oct 25 2007 - 11:51:57 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Bunching "transactions" Erik Jones 
• Wed Oct 24 2007 - 23:26:53 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] multiple apaches against single postgres database Tatsuo Ishii 
• Wed Oct 24 2007 - 13:22:35 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] multiple apaches against single postgres database Kevin Grittner 
• Wed Oct 24 2007 - 10:33:10 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] multiple apaches against single postgres database Sven Geisler 
• Wed Oct 24 2007 - 10:25:53 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Finalizing commit taking very long Giulio Cesare Solaroli 
• Wed Oct 24 2007 - 10:03:36 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Finalizing commit taking very long Tom Lane 
• Wed Oct 24 2007 - 09:37:07 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Finalizing commit taking very long Giulio Cesare Solaroli 
• Wed Oct 24 2007 - 09:14:42 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Jean-David Beyer 
• Wed Oct 24 2007 - 09:17:22 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] multiple apaches against single postgres database Gregory Stark 
• Wed Oct 24 2007 - 09:08:20 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] multiple apaches against single postgres database Michal Taborsky - Internet Mall 
• Wed Oct 24 2007 - 09:15:56 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Finalizing commit taking very long Tom Lane 
• Wed Oct 24 2007 - 08:15:14 EDT
  • [PERFORM] multiple apaches against single postgres database Honza Novak 
• Wed Oct 24 2007 - 06:44:35 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Finalizing commit taking very long Giulio Cesare Solaroli 
• Wed Oct 24 2007 - 05:04:27 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Harald Fuchs 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 14:22:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Alvaro Herrera 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 14:23:18 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Alvaro Herrera 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 14:03:14 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Simon Riggs 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 13:41:13 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Joshua D. Drake 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 13:00:05 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Ron St-Pierre 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 12:52:52 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Ron St-Pierre 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 12:43:08 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Ron St-Pierre 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 12:41:48 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Bill Moran 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 12:38:29 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Gregory Stark 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 12:33:16 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Ron St-Pierre 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 12:21:16 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Csaba Nagy 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 12:12:04 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Alvaro Herrera 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 12:11:51 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Tom Lane 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 12:07:50 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Bill Moran 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 11:53:17 EDT
  • [PERFORM] 12 hour table vacuums Ron St-Pierre 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 09:36:21 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Seqscan Nis Jørgensen 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 09:06:39 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Seqscan Adrian Demaestri 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 07:16:46 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to improve speed of 3 table join &group (HUGE tables) Nis Jørgensen 
• Tue Oct 23 2007 - 05:54:04 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] need help with a query Pavel Velikhov 
• Mon Oct 22 2007 - 22:45:11 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Seqscan Jeff Davis 
• Mon Oct 22 2007 - 22:24:39 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Seqscan Adrian Demaestri 
• Mon Oct 22 2007 - 13:34:06 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Memory Settings.... Kevin Grittner 
• Mon Oct 22 2007 - 13:30:18 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Memory Settings.... Heikki Linnakangas 
• Mon Oct 22 2007 - 13:23:20 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Memory Settings.... Ben 
• Mon Oct 22 2007 - 13:15:22 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Memory Settings.... Peter Koczan 
• Mon Oct 22 2007 - 12:10:11 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Memory Settings.... Lee Keel 
• Sun Oct 21 2007 - 12:44:01 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] need help with a query Jonah H. Harris 
• Sat Oct 20 2007 - 18:02:23 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [SQL] two queryes in a single tablescan Erik Jones 
• Sat Oct 20 2007 - 16:11:00 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] need help with a query Pavel Velikhov 
• Sat Oct 20 2007 - 13:19:39 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [SQL] two queryes in a single tablescan Andreas Kretschmer 
• Sat Oct 20 2007 - 06:58:24 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [SQL] two queryes in a single tablescan Markus Schaber 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 14:21:26 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] how to improve the performance of creating index Scott Marlowe 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 12:34:01 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] need help with a query Tom Lane 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 12:11:36 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] need help with a query Pavel Velikhov 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 11:52:58 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] need help with a query Jonah H. Harris 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 11:05:15 EDT
  • [PERFORM] need help with a query Pavel Velikhov 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 10:50:07 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] how to improve the performance of creating index Heikki Linnakangas 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 08:52:05 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] how to improve the performance of creating index Chris Browne 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 08:03:27 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] how to improve the performance of creating index Heikki Linnakangas 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 07:57:32 EDT
  • [PERFORM] how to improve the performance of creating index Yinan Li 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 00:40:17 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to improve speed of 3 table join &group (HUGE tables) ismo.tuononen(at)solenovo.fi 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 16:03:50 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Incorrect estimates on columns Chris Kratz 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 16:04:57 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to improve speed of 3 table join &group (HUGE tables) John Major 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 15:46:19 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to improve speed of 3 table join &group (HUGE tables) John Major 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 15:06:11 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to improve speed of 3 table join &group (HUGE tables) Heikki Linnakangas 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 14:58:17 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to improve speed of 3 table join &group (HUGE tables) Nis Jørgensen 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 13:01:01 EDT
  • [PERFORM] How to improve speed of 3 table join &group (HUGE tables) John Major 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 05:29:08 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Incorrect estimates on columns Nis Jørgensen 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 02:19:43 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Stéphane Schildknecht 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 02:17:27 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Stéphane Schildknecht 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 22:24:50 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] two queryes in a single tablescan æŽå½¦ Ian Li 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 21:33:46 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Shared Buffer setting in postgresql.conf Ow Mun Heng 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 20:23:39 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Incorrect estimates on columns Tom Lane 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 19:28:42 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction Tom Lane 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 16:40:58 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction Alvaro Herrera 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 15:43:40 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Incorrect estimates on columns Chris Kratz 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 14:49:34 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Incorrect estimates on columns Tom Lane 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 14:43:57 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Scott Marlowe 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 13:34:24 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Incorrect estimates on columns Chris Kratz 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 12:07:42 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Alvaro Herrera 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 11:56:14 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Tom Lane 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 11:53:46 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Tom Lane 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 10:35:16 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Stefano Dal Pra 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 09:43:28 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Alvaro Herrera 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 09:39:50 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] two queryes in a single tablescan Heikki Linnakangas 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 09:21:55 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] two queryes in a single tablescan Stefano Dal Pra 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 09:15:24 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] two queryes in a single tablescan Steinar H. Gunderson 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 09:00:58 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] two queryes in a single tablescan Heikki Linnakangas 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 08:30:52 EDT
  • [PERFORM] two queryes in a single tablescan Stefano Dal Pra 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 07:33:01 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Stéphane Schildknecht 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 01:32:47 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] using a stored proc that returns a result set in a complex SQL stmt Marcin StÄ™pnicki 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 23:19:51 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Joshua D. Drake 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 21:16:01 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Tom Lane 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 20:03:39 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Brian Herlihy 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 12:03:16 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Tom Lane 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 12:00:57 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory æŽå½¦ Ian Li 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 11:43:34 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Scott Marlowe 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 11:38:56 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Tom Lane 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 11:30:31 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Tom Lane 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 11:26:15 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Stéphane Schildknecht 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 11:22:48 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] using a stored proc that returns a result set in a complex SQL stmt Heikki Linnakangas 
• Mon Oct 15 2007 - 12:09:25 EDT
  • [PERFORM] using a stored proc that returns a result set in a complex SQL stmt chrisj 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 11:10:17 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Tom Lane 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 11:00:36 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Rodrigo Gonzalez 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:54:12 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Jason Lustig 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:33:15 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Mark Lewis 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:26:08 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Tom Lane 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:22:54 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Scott Marlowe 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:22:35 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Richard Huxton 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:14:30 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Jason Lustig 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:08:20 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Scott Marlowe 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:01:10 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Richard Huxton 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 09:32:54 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Jason Lustig 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 08:23:12 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Richard Huxton 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 07:55:35 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Jason Lustig 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 07:45:28 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Richard Huxton 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 07:12:11 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Autovacuum running out of memory Jason Lustig 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 05:50:51 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Stéphane Schildknecht 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 05:08:58 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Heikki Linnakangas 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 04:48:24 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Vacuum goes worse Stéphane Schildknecht 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 19:48:23 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table? henk de wit 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 19:13:38 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table? henk de wit 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 18:51:03 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table? Tom Lane 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 18:21:26 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table? henk de wit 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 18:17:41 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table? Tom Lane 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 18:13:14 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction Erik Jones 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 18:04:40 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table? Alan Hodgson 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 18:03:46 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table? Tom Lane 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 17:48:59 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction henk de wit 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 17:40:54 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table? henk de wit 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 17:39:26 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction Erik Jones 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 17:19:09 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table? henk de wit 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 17:09:35 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction henk de wit 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 16:59:52 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table? henk de wit 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 16:53:07 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table? Kevin Grittner 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 16:41:56 EDT
  • [PERFORM] How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table? henk de wit 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 15:59:16 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction Tom Lane 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 15:03:50 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Kevin Grittner 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 10:57:01 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Theo Kramer 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 09:02:32 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Merlin Moncure 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 04:26:01 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Richard Huxton 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 04:05:35 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Theo Kramer 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 03:38:01 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Theo Kramer 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 03:35:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Theo Kramer 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 21:26:59 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction Tom Lane 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 19:23:33 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction henk de wit 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 19:21:35 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction henk de wit 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 16:04:01 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Merlin Moncure 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 14:28:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Andrew - Supernews 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 13:49:43 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction Tom Lane 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 13:28:51 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Merlin Moncure 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 12:51:08 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction Erik Jones 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 12:12:20 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [GENERAL] Slow TSearch2 performance for table with 1 million documents. Benjamin Arai 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 11:53:05 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [GENERAL] Slow TSearch2 performance for table with 1 million documents. Tom Lane 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 10:52:29 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [GENERAL] Slow TSearch2 performance for table with 1 million documents. Benjamin Arai 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 10:51:35 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction Tom Lane 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 10:27:23 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction Scott Marlowe 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 10:16:20 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction Richard Huxton 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 10:04:38 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction henk de wit 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 06:33:18 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Theo Kramer 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 05:12:46 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Richard Huxton 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 04:52:05 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] building a performance test suite Dimitri Fontaine 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 04:51:58 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Cédric Villemain 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 23:16:23 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query taking too long. Problem reading explain output. Ow Mun Heng 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 23:14:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] building a performance test suite Greg Smith 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 20:49:23 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Shared Buffer setting in postgresql.conf Scott Marlowe 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 20:33:50 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Shared Buffer setting in postgresql.conf Radhika S 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 18:21:41 EDT
  • [PERFORM] building a performance test suite Kevin Kempter 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 18:09:34 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Kevin Grittner 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 18:08:59 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Tom Lane 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 17:02:59 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Kevin Grittner 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 16:58:54 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Shared Buffer setting in postgresql.conf Scott Marlowe 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 16:48:32 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Kevin Grittner 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 16:32:57 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Tom Lane 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 16:32:01 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Shared Buffer setting in postgresql.conf Josh Trutwin 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 16:11:48 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Kevin Grittner 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 16:08:30 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Theo Kramer 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 15:55:07 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Jonah H. Harris 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 15:52:25 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Simon Riggs 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 15:35:58 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Kevin Grittner 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 15:34:00 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Theo Kramer 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 15:01:03 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Simon Riggs 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 14:54:52 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Simon Riggs 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 14:30:13 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Kevin Grittner 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 14:07:30 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Tom Lane 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 13:25:31 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] SQL Monitoring Josh Trutwin 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 13:05:55 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Simon Riggs 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 11:20:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Shared Buffer setting in postgresql.conf Scott Marlowe 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 11:00:40 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Cédric Villemain 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 10:58:51 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] SQL Monitoring Rodrigo De León 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 10:45:40 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Performance problems with prepared statements Theo Kramer 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 10:15:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Kevin Grittner 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 06:41:49 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] SQL Monitoring Tomáš Vondra 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 02:31:44 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Simon Riggs 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 01:25:45 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Shared Buffer setting in postgresql.conf Marcin StÄ™pnicki 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 16:18:48 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Postgres running Very slowly Bill Moran 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 16:12:56 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Shared Buffer setting in postgresql.conf Radhika S 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 16:09:51 EDT
  • [PERFORM] hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan Kevin Grittner 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 16:00:04 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Postgres running Very slowly Radhika S 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 15:00:06 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] SQL Monitoring Gregory Stark 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 11:07:59 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] SQL Monitoring Heikki Linnakangas 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 10:36:31 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] SQL Monitoring Marcin StÄ™pnicki 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 10:11:43 EDT
  • [PERFORM] SQL Monitoring Campbell, Lance 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 13:09:48 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication Tino Wildenhain 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 13:12:23 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication Magnus Hagander 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 09:43:42 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] postgresql on NFS.. recommended? not recommended? Josh Tolley 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 08:39:31 EDT
  • [PERFORM] postgresql on NFS.. recommended? not recommended? Gábor Farkas 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 02:12:10 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication Magnus Hagander 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 20:29:27 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication Jeffrey Brower 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 16:58:29 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication Jeffrey Brower 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 16:44:57 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication D'Arcy J.M. Cain 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 16:28:55 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication Jeffrey Brower 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 15:07:36 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication Jeffrey Brower 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 12:06:37 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] query plan worse after analyze Richard Broersma Jr 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 11:19:51 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication A.M. 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 09:14:43 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication Jeffrey Brower 
• Sat Oct 06 2007 - 11:11:15 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] query plan worse after analyze Alvaro Herrera 
• Sat Oct 06 2007 - 02:41:05 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] query plan worse after analyze Jeff Frost 
• Sat Oct 06 2007 - 01:50:03 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] query plan worse after analyze Tom Lane 
• Sat Oct 06 2007 - 00:12:20 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] query plan worse after analyze Jeff Frost 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 23:58:51 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] query plan worse after analyze Rodrigo De León 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 23:14:38 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] query plan worse after analyze Stephen Frost 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 22:02:26 EDT
  • [PERFORM] query plan worse after analyze Jeff Frost 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 18:57:31 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [GENERAL] Slow TSearch2 performance for table with 1 million documents. Benjamin Arai 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 13:45:46 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with + 1 million record table Joshua D. Drake 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 12:38:22 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with + 1 million record table Arjen van der Meijden 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 11:32:32 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [GENERAL] Slow TSearch2 performance for table with 1 million documents. Oleg Bartunov 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 11:12:45 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] [GENERAL] Slow TSearch2 performance for table with 1 million documents. Tom Lane 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 11:01:59 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with + 1 million record table Scott Marlowe 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 10:34:07 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Problems with + 1 million record table Cláudia Macedo Amorim 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 03:50:17 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Slow TSearch2 performance for table with 1 million documents. Benjamin Arai 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 01:19:23 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Partitioning in postgres - basic question Chris 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 19:43:31 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query taking too long. Problem reading explain output. Alvaro Herrera 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 17:16:49 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Ben 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 17:15:47 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query taking too long. Problem reading explain output. Henrik 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 17:04:53 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Tom Lane 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 17:01:45 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Richard Huxton 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 16:35:46 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Scott Marlowe 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 16:34:22 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Ben 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 16:32:55 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Scott Marlowe 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 16:23:05 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Simon Riggs 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 15:52:36 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Ben 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 15:28:52 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Tuning Help - What did I do wrong? Josh Trutwin 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 15:03:07 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Tuning Help - What did I do wrong? Kevin Grittner 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 14:52:10 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Tom Lane 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 14:33:39 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Ben 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 14:22:42 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Andreas Kretschmer 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 14:14:11 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Bill Moran 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 14:10:24 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Mark Lewis 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 14:00:30 EDT
  • [PERFORM] quickly getting the top N rows Ben 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 13:51:14 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Partitioning in postgres - basic question Tore Lukashaugen 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 13:42:53 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Tuning Help - What did I do wrong? Scott Marlowe 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 13:00:27 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Tuning Help - What did I do wrong? Josh Trutwin 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 12:22:17 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Tuning Help - What did I do wrong? Scott Marlowe 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 12:19:22 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Tuning Help - What did I do wrong? Scott Marlowe 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 08:30:38 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query taking too long. Problem reading explain output. Alvaro Herrera 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 11:28:04 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Tuning Help - What did I do wrong? Josh Trutwin 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 06:11:48 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] can't shrink relation Guillaume Cottenceau 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 06:34:29 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] can't shrink relation Richard Huxton 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 06:15:04 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query taking too long. Problem reading explain output. Henrik 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 05:43:12 EDT
  • [PERFORM] can't shrink relation Sabin Coanda 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 05:46:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] can't shrink relation Sabin Coanda 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 09:31:29 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query taking too long. Problem reading explain output. Michael Fuhr 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 10:15:18 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query taking too long. Problem reading explain output. Tom Lane 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 04:03:53 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Query taking too long. Problem reading explain output. Henrik 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 03:00:52 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Newbie question about degraded performance on delete statement. (SOLVED) Giulio Cesare Solaroli 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 02:56:57 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Newbie question about degraded performance on delete statement. Giulio Cesare Solaroli 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 23:05:14 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Difference between Vacuum and Vacuum full Radhika S 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 22:02:01 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Difference between Vacuum and Vacuum full D'Arcy J.M. Cain 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 21:56:26 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Difference between Vacuum and Vacuum full Rodrigo De León 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 21:55:35 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Difference between Vacuum and Vacuum full Scott Marlowe 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 21:45:37 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Difference between Vacuum and Vacuum full Radhika S 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 18:39:51 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Newbie question about degraded performance on delete statement. Greg Williamson 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 17:55:08 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] performance of like queries Chris Browne 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 18:17:53 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Linux mis-reporting memory Decibel! 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 18:02:20 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Newbie question about degraded performance on delete statement. Dan Langille 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 17:55:27 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Newbie question about degraded performance on delete statement. Giulio Cesare Solaroli 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 17:49:19 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] performance of like queries Marcin StÄ™pnicki 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 17:06:20 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] performance of like queries Joshua D. Drake 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 13:31:45 EDT
  • [PERFORM] performance of like queries Kevin Kempter 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 14:37:30 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Linux mis-reporting memory Adam Tauno Williams 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 11:57:18 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Linux mis-reporting memory Decibel! 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 12:51:23 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Linux mis-reporting memory Scott Marlowe 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 15:23:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] sequence query performance issues Peter Koczan 

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 31 2008 - 17:16:56 EDT