Mailing List Archive For pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Nov 2007 By Author

• Adam Tauno Williams
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 08:56:46 EDT)
• adrobj
  • [PERFORM] Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 01:59:05 EST)
• Alan Hodgson
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 17:39:50 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 17:24:23 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 10:49:49 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 15:56:41 EST)
• Alex Hochberger
  • Re: [PERFORM] Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 14:21:10 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 13:28:35 EST)
• Alexander Staubo
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:00:20 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Wed Nov 07 2007 - 08:25:40 EST)
• Alvaro Herrera
  • Re: [PERFORM] Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 14:29:19 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 10:12:05 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 16:35:04 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 07:58:08 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 19:04:20 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 18:51:33 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 09:56:30 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Can I Determine if AutoVacuum Does Anything? (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 16:49:21 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 09:56:46 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans] (Fri Nov 02 2007 - 14:45:48 EDT)
• Andrew Sullivan
  • Re: [PERFORM] 7.4 Checkpoint Question (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:02:19 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 11:55:43 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 12:00:33 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 11:58:23 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 10:22:49 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 17:10:28 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 16:35:10 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 10:21:11 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 11:32:23 EST)
• Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 19:11:03 EST)
• Bill Moran
  • Re: [PERFORM] Appending "LIMIT" to query drastically decreases performance (Fri Nov 30 2007 - 09:20:33 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:59:35 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:54:41 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:27:16 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 13:55:50 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] tuning for TPC-C benchmark (Thu Nov 22 2007 - 09:33:04 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Mon Nov 19 2007 - 08:51:42 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 14:51:35 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 11:37:40 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 15:08:09 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:04:54 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:17:11 EST)
• Brad Nicholson
  • Re: [PERFORM] 7.4 Checkpoint Question (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:18:39 EST)
  • [PERFORM] 7.4 Checkpoint Question (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 10:10:54 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 10:56:48 EST)
• Brendan McMahon
  • [PERFORM] Optimizer regression 8.2.1 -> 8.2.3 on TSEARCH2 queries with ORDER BY and LIMIT (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 10:30:22 EST)
• Bruce Momjian
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris (Thu Nov 15 2007 - 15:49:27 EST)
• Campbell, Lance
  • [PERFORM] clear pg_stats (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 16:46:42 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:19:39 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:05:51 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 13:08:57 EST)
  • [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 12:49:03 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Training Recommendations (Mon Nov 05 2007 - 11:44:04 EST)
  • [PERFORM] index stat (Mon Nov 05 2007 - 11:42:46 EST)
• Carlo Stonebanks
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to avoid hashjoin and mergejoin (Fri Nov 02 2007 - 10:46:11 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to avoid hashjoin and mergejoin (Fri Nov 02 2007 - 00:12:29 EDT)
  • [PERFORM] How to avoid hashjoin and mergejoin (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 16:57:34 EDT)
• Chris Browne
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:47:44 EST)
• Chris Hoover
  • [PERFORM] Help understanding stat numbers (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 09:49:41 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Which index methodology is better?- (Mon Nov 05 2007 - 13:43:07 EST)
• claudia.amorim(at)pcinformatica.com.br
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 (Sun Nov 25 2007 - 11:19:03 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 (Sun Nov 25 2007 - 07:42:01 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 (Sat Nov 24 2007 - 23:57:01 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 (Sat Nov 24 2007 - 07:00:25 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 (Fri Nov 23 2007 - 18:20:47 EST)
• Claus Guttesen
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:40:50 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Tue Nov 06 2007 - 06:36:33 EST)
  • [PERFORM] hp ciss on freebsd (Mon Nov 05 2007 - 08:19:18 EST)
• cluster
  • Re: [PERFORM] Appending "LIMIT" to query drastically decreases performance (Fri Nov 30 2007 - 11:01:11 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Appending "LIMIT" to query drastically decreases performance (Fri Nov 30 2007 - 06:16:08 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 06:07:37 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 16:15:59 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 15:16:08 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:51:40 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 13:21:38 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 11:33:36 EST)
• Craig James
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 09:56:33 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 22:02:49 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Is ANALYZE transactional? (Tue Nov 06 2007 - 00:12:37 EST)
• Csaba Nagy
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Fri Nov 30 2007 - 05:29:43 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:54:32 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 09:03:44 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:48:22 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 06:56:34 EST)
• Cédric Villemain
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 05:17:57 EST)
• Damon Hart
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:41:39 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:40:24 EST)
  • [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 17:50:08 EST)
• Dave Cramer
  • Re: [PERFORM] difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 13:32:34 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 10:13:24 EST)
  • [PERFORM] difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 09:51:30 EST)
• Dave Dutcher
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 11:00:05 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 18:47:31 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 14:04:28 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 10:56:28 EST)
• David Crane
  • [PERFORM] Can I Determine if AutoVacuum Does Anything? (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 16:44:11 EST)
• david(at)lang.hm
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 16:55:23 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 10:03:26 EST)
• Dean Rasheed
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problem with UNION ALL view and domains (Sat Nov 24 2007 - 07:06:01 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Performance problem with UNION ALL view and domains (Fri Nov 23 2007 - 08:29:40 EST)
  • RE: [PERFORM] Performance problem (outer join + view + non-strict functions)þ (Sun Nov 18 2007 - 17:13:58 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Performance problem (outer join + view + non-strict functions)þ (Sun Nov 18 2007 - 05:34:15 EST)
• Decibel!
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Sun Nov 18 2007 - 23:14:09 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Sun Nov 18 2007 - 23:11:15 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Sun Nov 18 2007 - 23:08:40 EST)
• Dimitri
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Sun Nov 11 2007 - 14:27:02 EST)
• Dimitri Fontaine
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 15:14:36 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Tue Nov 06 2007 - 10:18:51 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Tue Nov 06 2007 - 06:53:44 EST)
• Erik Jones
  • Re: [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases (Sun Nov 25 2007 - 13:20:45 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Thu Nov 15 2007 - 11:02:36 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 10:22:04 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 15:38:43 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 10:50:47 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Migrating to 8.3 - checkpoints and background writer (Mon Nov 05 2007 - 11:54:05 EST)
• Fabio Arias
  • [PERFORM] Base de Datos Transaccional (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 15:22:46 EST)
• Florian Weimer
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 06:30:33 EST)
• gabor
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Sun Nov 18 2007 - 14:26:12 EST)
• Gianluca Alberici
  • [PERFORM] 8.1 planner problem ? (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 02:24:20 EST)
• giuseppe-r(at)tiscali.it
  • [PERFORM] tuning for TPC-C benchmark (Thu Nov 22 2007 - 09:09:52 EST)
• Greg Smith
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 19:57:20 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Mon Nov 19 2007 - 12:22:57 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 13:03:20 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:11:18 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Tue Nov 06 2007 - 13:10:10 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] hp ciss on freebsd (Mon Nov 05 2007 - 11:32:28 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Migrating to 8.3 - checkpoints and background writer (Sun Nov 04 2007 - 22:06:26 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Migrating to 8.3 - checkpoints and background writer (Sun Nov 04 2007 - 19:33:46 EST)
• Gregory Stark
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 06:59:51 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:55:02 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:36:48 EST)
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 04:21:56 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 18:10:49 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 01:21:10 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 (Mon Nov 05 2007 - 07:12:27 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 11:47:32 EDT)
• Guillaume Smet
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 15:57:27 EST)
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:39:51 EST)
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 02:52:49 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:29:34 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 05:08:33 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Wed Nov 07 2007 - 18:36:16 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Wed Nov 07 2007 - 18:32:55 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Wed Nov 07 2007 - 11:52:16 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Wed Nov 07 2007 - 08:38:04 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Wed Nov 07 2007 - 07:53:16 EST)
• Gábor Farkas
  • [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 04:40:43 EST)
• Heikki Linnakangas
  • Re: [PERFORM] clear pg_stats (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 16:54:08 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] 8.1 planner problem ? (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 05:12:38 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 04:39:23 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases (Sun Nov 25 2007 - 13:17:59 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 (Sat Nov 24 2007 - 03:53:24 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] tuning for TPC-C benchmark (Thu Nov 22 2007 - 14:22:41 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 14:33:07 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 13:03:16 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 12:01:19 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 11:31:41 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 12:56:30 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:09:55 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 06:12:07 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Which index methodology is better?- (Mon Nov 05 2007 - 15:07:59 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Postgresql.conf Settings (Sun Nov 04 2007 - 14:30:12 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Union within View vs.Union of Views (Sat Nov 03 2007 - 19:03:39 EDT)
• hubert depesz lubaczewski
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 04:45:41 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? (Fri Nov 02 2007 - 03:56:04 EDT)
• Ivan Voras
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 14:47:16 EST)
  • [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 07:06:27 EST)
• Jean-David Beyer
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 17:03:29 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Mon Nov 19 2007 - 10:46:42 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Mon Nov 19 2007 - 08:39:08 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 22:26:02 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 22:16:45 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 16:51:44 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 16:07:36 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 12:02:23 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 11:53:17 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 09:58:33 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 07:12:45 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 21:26:08 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 18:09:33 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 14:50:59 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Sat Nov 10 2007 - 21:22:58 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Sat Nov 10 2007 - 14:57:10 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Sat Nov 10 2007 - 13:38:23 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Sat Nov 10 2007 - 11:27:07 EST)
• Jeff Davis
  • Re: [PERFORM] Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 14:34:36 EST)
• Jeff Frost
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 21:19:17 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 17:36:54 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 15:32:18 EST)
• Jeff Larsen
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problem with UNION ALL view and domains (Fri Nov 23 2007 - 11:29:07 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Union within View vs.Union of Views (Sun Nov 04 2007 - 05:11:02 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Union within View vs.Union of Views (Sat Nov 03 2007 - 21:57:21 EDT)
  • [PERFORM] Union within View vs.Union of Views (Sat Nov 03 2007 - 16:22:18 EDT)
• Jeff Trout
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Thu Nov 15 2007 - 09:41:59 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] hp ciss on freebsd (Mon Nov 05 2007 - 10:47:53 EST)
• Jens-Wolfhard Schicke
  • [PERFORM] random_page_cost etc. per tablespace? (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 05:24:42 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Subpar Execution Plan (Tue Nov 06 2007 - 15:48:12 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Unfortunate expansion of composite types in union (Sun Nov 04 2007 - 11:59:43 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Unfortunate expansion of composite types in union (Fri Nov 02 2007 - 05:38:53 EDT)
• Joe Uhl
  • Re: [PERFORM] hardware and For PostgreSQL (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 07:00:57 EDT)
• Jonah H. Harris
  • Re: [PERFORM] tuning for TPC-C benchmark (Thu Nov 22 2007 - 12:38:24 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] tuning for TPC-C benchmark (Thu Nov 22 2007 - 09:59:49 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 15:53:51 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 11:06:11 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 09:49:16 EST)
• Josh Berkus
  • Re: [PERFORM] Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server (Fri Nov 30 2007 - 00:50:14 EST)
• Josh Trutwin
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 15:36:50 EST)
• Joshua D. Drake
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 12:23:07 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Mon Nov 19 2007 - 12:18:59 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Sun Nov 11 2007 - 15:17:22 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Sat Nov 10 2007 - 13:51:19 EST)
• Jurgen Haan
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:01:08 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL (Fri Nov 02 2007 - 10:05:13 EDT)
• Kevin Grittner
  • Re: [PERFORM] tuning for TPC-C benchmark (Thu Nov 22 2007 - 10:45:07 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 17:12:49 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 15:31:04 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] index stat (Wed Nov 07 2007 - 11:32:15 EST)
• Kevin Kempter
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 11:57:07 EST)
• Luke Lonergan
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Fri Nov 30 2007 - 10:45:27 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 01:40:20 EST)
• Magnus Hagander
  • Re: [PERFORM] clear pg_stats (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 16:57:25 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 03:52:21 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] hardware and For PostgreSQL (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 02:57:02 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 02:54:50 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 02:52:41 EDT)
• Mario Weilguni
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 14:21:24 EST)
• Mark F
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL (RAID configurations) (Fri Nov 02 2007 - 17:23:53 EDT)
  • [PERFORM] (Fri Nov 02 2007 - 16:03:12 EDT)
• Mark Floyd
  • [PERFORM] hardware for PostgreSQL (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 21:15:22 EDT)
• Mark Kirkwood
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 18:31:01 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 02:18:47 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 (Wed Nov 07 2007 - 21:46:34 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 (Mon Nov 05 2007 - 00:49:26 EST)
• Mark Mielke
  • Re: [PERFORM] Union within View vs.Union of Views (Sat Nov 03 2007 - 17:39:21 EDT)
• Matthew
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples (Fri Nov 30 2007 - 08:45:41 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Appending "LIMIT" to query drastically decreases performance (Fri Nov 30 2007 - 08:30:28 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:34:37 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 11:08:51 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 09:40:41 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:08:04 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 07:53:47 EST)
  • [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 13:28:23 EST)
• Matthew Schumacher
  • [PERFORM] Postgres ignoring index when using left outer join. (Tue Nov 20 2007 - 23:14:31 EST)
• Matthew T. O'Connor
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 15:23:10 EST)
• Merlin Moncure
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 17:01:19 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:56:32 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 22:36:11 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 22:20:41 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 19:28:24 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Database connections and stored procs (functions) (Mon Nov 05 2007 - 21:47:02 EST)
• Oleg Bartunov
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 12:34:01 EST)
• Ow Mun Heng
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Sun Nov 18 2007 - 20:27:47 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 04:43:05 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 20:26:54 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 03:46:01 EDT)
• Pablo Alcaraz
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 09:57:14 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 09:15:11 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 18:06:34 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Base de Datos Transaccional (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 15:53:42 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 13:44:23 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases (Sun Nov 25 2007 - 17:37:45 EST)
  • [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases (Sun Nov 25 2007 - 11:46:37 EST)
• Palle Girgensohn
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? (Fri Nov 02 2007 - 06:44:24 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 11:25:08 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 10:36:29 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 10:20:14 EDT)
  • [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 09:07:55 EDT)
• Pavel Stehule
  • Re: [PERFORM] Unfortunate expansion of composite types in union (Fri Nov 02 2007 - 06:32:08 EDT)
• Pepe Barbe
  • [PERFORM] Join performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 17:47:09 EST)
• Peter Childs
  • Re: [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 05:41:24 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases (Sun Nov 25 2007 - 14:15:17 EST)
• Peter Koczan
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 15:18:51 EST)
  • [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 12:04:50 EST)
• Peter T. Breuer
  • Re: [PERFORM] Base de Datos Transaccional (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 15:36:18 EST)
• Radhika S
  • [PERFORM] Database connections and stored procs (functions) (Mon Nov 05 2007 - 10:32:46 EST)
• Rafael Martinez
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 04:03:19 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 03:49:43 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 11:11:59 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 10:38:03 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:15:45 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:10:10 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 09:49:36 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 05:36:36 EST)
• Richard Huxton
  • Re: [PERFORM] Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 14:15:15 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Windows XP selects are very slow (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 07:28:21 EST)
• Robert Treat
  • Re: [PERFORM] Training Recommendations (Fri Nov 30 2007 - 04:15:09 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 12:14:35 EST)
• Ron Mayer
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:44:04 EST)
• Russell Smith
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Fri Nov 30 2007 - 01:41:53 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 16:46:05 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance (Sat Nov 10 2007 - 00:26:17 EST)
• Sami Dalouche
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans] (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 10:21:17 EDT)
• Scott Marlowe
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 01:49:41 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:06:39 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:00:53 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 (Sun Nov 25 2007 - 09:33:41 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 (Sun Nov 25 2007 - 01:25:56 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers (Sun Nov 18 2007 - 09:41:59 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 12:04:44 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 11:35:52 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Sat Nov 10 2007 - 21:11:03 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 15:47:01 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:24:56 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:12:42 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:55:45 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 10:57:33 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 18:24:51 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 13:22:48 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Postgresql.conf Settings (Sun Nov 04 2007 - 12:37:02 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] hardware for PostgreSQL (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 23:31:03 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to avoid hashjoin and mergejoin (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 17:38:35 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 11:28:53 EDT)
• Sebastian Hennebrueder
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 10:41:19 EST)
• Shadkam Islam
  • [PERFORM] Windows XP selects are very slow (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 04:30:55 EST)
• Simon Riggs
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Fri Nov 30 2007 - 03:40:19 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:14:26 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] 7.4 Checkpoint Question (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:14:21 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:28:28 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:22:56 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 15:57:25 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers (Sun Nov 18 2007 - 09:29:39 EST)
• smiley2211
  • Re: [PERFORM] Postgresql.conf Settings (Sun Nov 04 2007 - 13:30:28 EST)
  • [PERFORM] Postgresql.conf Settings (Sun Nov 04 2007 - 11:28:30 EST)
• Steinar H. Gunderson
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 15:30:24 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 15:34:42 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 19:28:18 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 18:38:33 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 13:38:55 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD (Sun Nov 11 2007 - 18:43:52 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 17:51:20 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Migrating to 8.3 - checkpoints and background writer (Sun Nov 04 2007 - 19:39:48 EST)
• Stephane Bailliez
  • Re: [PERFORM] ERROR: "invalid memory alloc request size" or "unexpected end of data" on large table (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 10:06:50 EST)
  • [PERFORM] ERROR: "invalid memory alloc request size" or "unexpected end of data" on large table (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 14:57:48 EST)
• Stephen Cook
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 14:16:28 EST)
• Stephen Frost
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:42:53 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Tue Nov 06 2007 - 08:48:31 EST)
• Steve Crawford
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 14:16:13 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 12:20:46 EDT)
• tmp
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 20:08:40 EST)
• Tobias Brox
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Sun Nov 18 2007 - 14:00:53 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 06:13:55 EST)
• Tom Lane
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 10:45:31 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Thu Nov 29 2007 - 10:32:23 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 17:24:24 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:12:52 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 10:34:52 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 19:25:54 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run (Tue Nov 27 2007 - 12:26:08 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels (Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:06:34 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases (Sun Nov 25 2007 - 14:35:27 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problem with UNION ALL view and domains (Fri Nov 23 2007 - 12:41:58 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Mon Nov 19 2007 - 10:23:18 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problem (outer join + view + non-strict functions)þ (Sun Nov 18 2007 - 13:28:39 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Wed Nov 14 2007 - 17:46:24 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] ERROR: "invalid memory alloc request size" or "unexpected end of data" on large table (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 17:54:22 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? (Mon Nov 12 2007 - 11:37:14 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Sat Nov 10 2007 - 12:08:11 EST)
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:33:45 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help understanding stat numbers (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 02:08:56 EST)
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 21:08:34 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 19:42:31 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 19:40:20 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 19:15:04 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 19:15:04 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 19:15:04 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 19:15:05 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 12:22:28 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:33:00 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:01:09 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Wed Nov 07 2007 - 18:14:08 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Wed Nov 07 2007 - 11:58:49 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / (Wed Nov 07 2007 - 11:34:52 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Is ANALYZE transactional? (Tue Nov 06 2007 - 00:30:34 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Which index methodology is better?- (Mon Nov 05 2007 - 14:56:29 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] "MixedCase sensitive quoted" names (Sat Nov 03 2007 - 21:45:37 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Union within View vs.Union of Views (Sat Nov 03 2007 - 21:38:35 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to avoid hashjoin and mergejoin (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 17:41:58 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 11:34:42 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 11:06:57 EDT)
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 09:43:39 EDT)
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans] (Thu Nov 01 2007 - 09:29:56 EDT)
• Tomáš Vondra
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 06:20:22 EST)
• Tore Halset
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Tue Nov 06 2007 - 09:15:39 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Tue Nov 06 2007 - 09:14:19 EST)
  • [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Tue Nov 06 2007 - 05:12:23 EST)
• Trevor Talbot
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases (Fri Nov 30 2007 - 05:15:45 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. (Tue Nov 13 2007 - 18:59:19 EST)
• tv(at)fuzzy.cz
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Mon Nov 19 2007 - 04:53:08 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? (Fri Nov 16 2007 - 08:38:23 EST)
• Usama Munir Dar
  • Re: [PERFORM] Windows XP selects are very slow (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 11:15:09 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Training Recommendations (Wed Nov 28 2007 - 11:20:46 EST)
• Vivek Khera
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Thu Nov 15 2007 - 15:28:44 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:08:41 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 17:01:41 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 11:43:04 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 11:41:18 EST)
  • Re: [PERFORM] hp ciss on freebsd (Thu Nov 08 2007 - 11:37:50 EST)
• Whatever Deep
  • [PERFORM] "MixedCase sensitive quoted" names (Sat Nov 03 2007 - 19:40:42 EDT)

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 31 2008 - 17:16:56 EDT