Mailing List Archive For pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Nov 2007 By Date

• Fri Nov 30 2007 - 11:01:11 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Appending "LIMIT" to query drastically decreases performance cluster 
• Fri Nov 30 2007 - 10:45:27 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Luke Lonergan 
• Fri Nov 30 2007 - 09:20:33 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Appending "LIMIT" to query drastically decreases performance Bill Moran 
• Fri Nov 30 2007 - 08:45:41 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples Matthew 
• Fri Nov 30 2007 - 08:30:28 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Appending "LIMIT" to query drastically decreases performance Matthew 
• Fri Nov 30 2007 - 06:16:08 EST
  • [PERFORM] Appending "LIMIT" to query drastically decreases performance cluster 
• Fri Nov 30 2007 - 05:29:43 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Csaba Nagy 
• Fri Nov 30 2007 - 05:15:45 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Trevor Talbot 
• Fri Nov 30 2007 - 00:50:14 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server Josh Berkus 
• Fri Nov 30 2007 - 04:15:09 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Training Recommendations Robert Treat 
• Fri Nov 30 2007 - 01:41:53 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Russell Smith 
• Fri Nov 30 2007 - 03:40:19 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Simon Riggs 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 18:31:01 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Mark Kirkwood 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 16:57:25 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] clear pg_stats Magnus Hagander 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 16:54:08 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] clear pg_stats Heikki Linnakangas 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 16:46:42 EST
  • [PERFORM] clear pg_stats Campbell, Lance 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 15:30:24 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples Steinar H. Gunderson 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 15:23:10 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples Matthew T. O'Connor 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 14:29:19 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server Alvaro Herrera 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 14:21:10 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server Alex Hochberger 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 14:15:15 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server Richard Huxton 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 13:28:35 EST
  • [PERFORM] Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server Alex Hochberger 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:54:32 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Csaba Nagy 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:42:53 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Stephen Frost 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:18:39 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] 7.4 Checkpoint Question Brad Nicholson 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:14:26 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Simon Riggs 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:14:21 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] 7.4 Checkpoint Question Simon Riggs 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:02:19 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] 7.4 Checkpoint Question Andrew Sullivan 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 10:45:31 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 10:32:23 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 10:10:54 EST
  • [PERFORM] 7.4 Checkpoint Question Brad Nicholson 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 06:59:51 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Gregory Stark 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 06:07:37 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run cluster 
• Thu Nov 29 2007 - 01:49:41 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Scott Marlowe 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 17:24:24 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Tom Lane 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 17:03:29 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Jean-David Beyer 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 16:15:59 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run cluster 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 16:55:23 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases david(at)lang.hm 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 15:34:42 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Steinar H. Gunderson 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 15:16:08 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run cluster 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:34:37 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Matthew 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:28:28 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Simon Riggs 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:22:56 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Simon Riggs 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:12:52 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Tom Lane 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 11:15:09 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Windows XP selects are very slow Usama Munir Dar 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 11:20:46 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Training Recommendations Usama Munir Dar 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 11:08:51 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples Matthew 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 11:00:05 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Dave Dutcher 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 10:34:52 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples Tom Lane 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 10:30:22 EST
  • [PERFORM] Optimizer regression 8.2.1 -> 8.2.3 on TSEARCH2 queries with ORDER BY and LIMIT Brendan McMahon 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 10:12:05 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Alvaro Herrera 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 09:57:14 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Pablo Alcaraz 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 09:56:33 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Craig James 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 09:40:41 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Matthew 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 09:15:11 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Pablo Alcaraz 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 09:03:44 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Csaba Nagy 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:59:35 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Bill Moran 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 10:03:26 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases david(at)lang.hm 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:55:02 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Gregory Stark 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:54:41 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Bill Moran 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:48:22 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Csaba Nagy 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:36:48 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples Gregory Stark 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:27:16 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Bill Moran 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:08:04 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples Matthew 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 07:53:47 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Matthew 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 07:28:21 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Windows XP selects are very slow Richard Huxton 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 20:08:40 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run tmp 
• Wed Nov 28 2007 - 04:30:55 EST
  • [PERFORM] Windows XP selects are very slow Shadkam Islam 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 19:28:18 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Steinar H. Gunderson 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 19:25:54 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Tom Lane 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 18:47:31 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Dave Dutcher 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 18:38:33 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Steinar H. Gunderson 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:51:40 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run cluster 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 18:06:34 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Pablo Alcaraz 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 15:57:25 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Simon Riggs 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 15:18:51 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Peter Koczan 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 14:04:28 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Dave Dutcher 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 13:55:50 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Bill Moran 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 13:21:38 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run cluster 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 13:38:55 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples Steinar H. Gunderson 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 13:28:23 EST
  • [PERFORM] GiST indexing tuples Matthew 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 12:26:08 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Tom Lane 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 11:57:07 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Kevin Kempter 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 11:55:43 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run Andrew Sullivan 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 11:33:36 EST
  • [PERFORM] Query only slow on first run cluster 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 05:12:38 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] 8.1 planner problem ? Heikki Linnakangas 
• Tue Nov 27 2007 - 02:24:20 EST
  • [PERFORM] 8.1 planner problem ? Gianluca Alberici 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 19:57:20 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Greg Smith 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:41:39 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Damon Hart 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:40:24 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Damon Hart 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:06:39 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Scott Marlowe 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:06:34 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Tom Lane 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:00:53 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Scott Marlowe 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:00:20 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Alexander Staubo 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 17:50:08 EST
  • [PERFORM] PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Damon Hart 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 15:53:42 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Base de Datos Transaccional Pablo Alcaraz 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 15:36:18 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Base de Datos Transaccional Peter T. Breuer 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 15:22:46 EST
  • [PERFORM] Base de Datos Transaccional Fabio Arias 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 14:16:28 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Stephen Cook 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 13:44:23 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Pablo Alcaraz 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 12:34:01 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Oleg Bartunov 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 12:23:07 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Joshua D. Drake 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 12:04:50 EST
  • [PERFORM] TB-sized databases Peter Koczan 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 05:41:24 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Peter Childs 
• Mon Nov 26 2007 - 04:39:23 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 Heikki Linnakangas 
• Sun Nov 25 2007 - 17:37:45 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Pablo Alcaraz 
• Sun Nov 25 2007 - 14:35:27 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Tom Lane 
• Sun Nov 25 2007 - 14:15:17 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Peter Childs 
• Sun Nov 25 2007 - 13:20:45 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Erik Jones 
• Sun Nov 25 2007 - 13:17:59 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Heikki Linnakangas 
• Sun Nov 25 2007 - 11:46:37 EST
  • [PERFORM] doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases Pablo Alcaraz 
• Sun Nov 25 2007 - 11:19:03 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 claudia.amorim(at)pcinformatica.com.br 
• Sun Nov 25 2007 - 09:33:41 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 Scott Marlowe 
• Sun Nov 25 2007 - 07:42:01 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 claudia.amorim(at)pcinformatica.com.br 
• Sun Nov 25 2007 - 01:25:56 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 Scott Marlowe 
• Sat Nov 24 2007 - 23:57:01 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 claudia.amorim(at)pcinformatica.com.br 
• Sat Nov 24 2007 - 07:06:01 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problem with UNION ALL view and domains Dean Rasheed 
• Sat Nov 24 2007 - 07:00:25 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 claudia.amorim(at)pcinformatica.com.br 
• Sat Nov 24 2007 - 03:53:24 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 Heikki Linnakangas 
• Fri Nov 23 2007 - 18:20:47 EST
  • [PERFORM] Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003 claudia.amorim(at)pcinformatica.com.br 
• Fri Nov 23 2007 - 12:41:58 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problem with UNION ALL view and domains Tom Lane 
• Fri Nov 23 2007 - 11:29:07 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problem with UNION ALL view and domains Jeff Larsen 
• Fri Nov 23 2007 - 08:29:40 EST
  • [PERFORM] Performance problem with UNION ALL view and domains Dean Rasheed 
• Thu Nov 22 2007 - 14:22:41 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] tuning for TPC-C benchmark Heikki Linnakangas 
• Thu Nov 22 2007 - 12:38:24 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] tuning for TPC-C benchmark Jonah H. Harris 
• Thu Nov 22 2007 - 10:45:07 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] tuning for TPC-C benchmark Kevin Grittner 
• Thu Nov 22 2007 - 09:59:49 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] tuning for TPC-C benchmark Jonah H. Harris 
• Thu Nov 22 2007 - 09:33:04 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] tuning for TPC-C benchmark Bill Moran 
• Thu Nov 22 2007 - 09:09:52 EST
  • [PERFORM] tuning for TPC-C benchmark giuseppe-r(at)tiscali.it 
• Tue Nov 20 2007 - 23:14:31 EST
  • [PERFORM] Postgres ignoring index when using left outer join. Matthew Schumacher 
• Mon Nov 19 2007 - 12:22:57 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? Greg Smith 
• Mon Nov 19 2007 - 12:18:59 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? Joshua D. Drake 
• Mon Nov 19 2007 - 10:46:42 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? Jean-David Beyer 
• Mon Nov 19 2007 - 10:23:18 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? Tom Lane 
• Mon Nov 19 2007 - 08:51:42 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? Bill Moran 
• Mon Nov 19 2007 - 08:39:08 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? Jean-David Beyer 
• Mon Nov 19 2007 - 04:53:08 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? tv(at)fuzzy.cz 
• Sun Nov 18 2007 - 23:14:09 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? Decibel! 
• Sun Nov 18 2007 - 23:11:15 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? Decibel! 
• Sun Nov 18 2007 - 23:08:40 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? Decibel! 
• Sun Nov 18 2007 - 20:27:47 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Ow Mun Heng 
• Sun Nov 18 2007 - 17:13:58 EST
  • RE: [PERFORM] Performance problem (outer join + view + non-strict functions)þ Dean Rasheed 
• Sun Nov 18 2007 - 14:26:12 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? gabor 
• Sun Nov 18 2007 - 14:00:53 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? Tobias Brox 
• Sun Nov 18 2007 - 13:28:39 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Performance problem (outer join + view + non-strict functions)þ Tom Lane 
• Sun Nov 18 2007 - 09:41:59 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers Scott Marlowe 
• Sun Nov 18 2007 - 09:29:39 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers Simon Riggs 
• Sun Nov 18 2007 - 05:34:15 EST
  • [PERFORM] Performance problem (outer join + view + non-strict functions)þ Dean Rasheed 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 17:12:49 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Kevin Grittner 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 17:01:19 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Merlin Moncure 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 15:53:51 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Jonah H. Harris 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 15:36:50 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Josh Trutwin 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 14:51:35 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) Bill Moran 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 14:34:36 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) Jeff Davis 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 14:33:07 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) Heikki Linnakangas 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 14:47:16 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Ivan Voras 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 01:59:05 EST
  • [PERFORM] Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) adrobj 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 11:06:11 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Jonah H. Harris 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 10:56:48 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Brad Nicholson 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 10:56:28 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Dave Dutcher 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 08:38:23 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? tv(at)fuzzy.cz 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 06:56:34 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? Csaba Nagy 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 06:13:55 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? Tobias Brox 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 04:45:41 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? hubert depesz lubaczewski 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 04:43:05 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Ow Mun Heng 
• Fri Nov 16 2007 - 04:40:43 EST
  • [PERFORM] autovacuum: recommended? Gábor Farkas 
• Thu Nov 15 2007 - 15:49:27 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris Bruce Momjian 
• Thu Nov 15 2007 - 15:28:44 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Vivek Khera 
• Thu Nov 15 2007 - 11:02:36 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Erik Jones 
• Thu Nov 15 2007 - 09:41:59 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Jeff Trout 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 22:26:02 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 22:16:45 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 22:02:49 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Craig James 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 21:19:17 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Jeff Frost 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:56:32 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Merlin Moncure 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 17:46:24 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Tom Lane 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 17:39:50 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Alan Hodgson 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 17:36:54 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Jeff Frost 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 17:24:23 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Alan Hodgson 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 16:51:44 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 16:46:05 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Russell Smith 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 16:35:04 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Alvaro Herrera 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 16:07:36 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 14:21:24 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Mario Weilguni 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 12:02:23 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 12:00:33 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Andrew Sullivan 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 11:58:23 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Andrew Sullivan 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 11:53:17 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 10:22:49 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Andrew Sullivan 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 09:58:33 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 07:58:08 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Alvaro Herrera 
• Wed Nov 14 2007 - 07:12:45 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 22:36:11 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Merlin Moncure 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 22:20:41 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Merlin Moncure 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 21:26:08 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 19:28:24 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Merlin Moncure 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 19:11:03 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 19:04:20 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Alvaro Herrera 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 18:59:19 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Trevor Talbot 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 18:51:33 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Alvaro Herrera 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 18:09:33 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 17:10:28 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Andrew Sullivan 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 16:35:10 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Andrew Sullivan 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 15:32:18 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Jeff Frost 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 14:50:59 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 10:49:49 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Alan Hodgson 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 10:21:11 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Andrew Sullivan 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 10:06:50 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] ERROR: "invalid memory alloc request size" or "unexpected end of data" on large table Stephane Bailliez 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 05:24:42 EST
  • [PERFORM] random_page_cost etc. per tablespace? Jens-Wolfhard Schicke 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 04:03:19 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Rafael Martinez 
• Tue Nov 13 2007 - 03:49:43 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Rafael Martinez 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 17:54:22 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] ERROR: "invalid memory alloc request size" or "unexpected end of data" on large table Tom Lane 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 14:57:48 EST
  • [PERFORM] ERROR: "invalid memory alloc request size" or "unexpected end of data" on large table Stephane Bailliez 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 13:32:34 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? Dave Cramer 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 13:03:16 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Heikki Linnakangas 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 12:04:44 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Scott Marlowe 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 12:01:19 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Heikki Linnakangas 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 11:37:14 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? Tom Lane 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 11:37:40 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Bill Moran 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 11:35:52 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Scott Marlowe 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 11:32:23 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Andrew Sullivan 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 11:31:41 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Heikki Linnakangas 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 11:11:59 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Rafael Martinez 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 10:38:03 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Rafael Martinez 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 10:22:04 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Erik Jones 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 10:13:24 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? Dave Cramer 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 09:56:30 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? Alvaro Herrera 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 09:51:30 EST
  • [PERFORM] difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ??? Dave Cramer 
• Mon Nov 12 2007 - 05:17:57 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers Cédric Villemain 
• Sun Nov 11 2007 - 18:43:52 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Steinar H. Gunderson 
• Sun Nov 11 2007 - 15:17:22 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Joshua D. Drake 
• Sun Nov 11 2007 - 14:27:02 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Dimitri 
• Sat Nov 10 2007 - 21:22:58 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Sat Nov 10 2007 - 21:11:03 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Scott Marlowe 
• Sat Nov 10 2007 - 14:57:10 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Sat Nov 10 2007 - 13:51:19 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Joshua D. Drake 
• Sat Nov 10 2007 - 13:38:23 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Sat Nov 10 2007 - 12:08:11 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Tom Lane 
• Sat Nov 10 2007 - 11:27:07 EST
  • [PERFORM] Curious about dead rows. Jean-David Beyer 
• Sat Nov 10 2007 - 00:26:17 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance Russell Smith 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 16:49:21 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Can I Determine if AutoVacuum Does Anything? Alvaro Herrera 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 16:44:11 EST
  • [PERFORM] Can I Determine if AutoVacuum Does Anything? David Crane 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 15:57:27 EST
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Guillaume Smet 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 15:47:01 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers Scott Marlowe 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 15:38:43 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers Erik Jones 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:44:04 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Ron Mayer 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:24:56 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers Scott Marlowe 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:19:39 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers Campbell, Lance 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:12:42 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers Scott Marlowe 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:08:41 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Vivek Khera 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:05:51 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers Campbell, Lance 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 15:08:09 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers Bill Moran 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 13:08:57 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers Campbell, Lance 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 13:03:20 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Greg Smith 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:04:54 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Bill Moran 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 12:56:30 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers Heikki Linnakangas 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 12:49:03 EST
  • [PERFORM] work_mem and shared_buffers Campbell, Lance 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:55:45 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Scott Marlowe 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:40:50 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Claus Guttesen 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:39:51 EST
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Guillaume Smet 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:33:45 EST
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Tom Lane 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:11:18 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Greg Smith 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:01:08 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Jurgen Haan 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 10:57:33 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Scott Marlowe 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 10:50:47 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Erik Jones 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 10:41:19 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Sebastian Hennebrueder 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 09:49:16 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Jonah H. Harris 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 07:06:27 EST
  • [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Ivan Voras 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 06:30:33 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Florian Weimer 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 04:21:56 EST
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Gregory Stark 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 02:52:49 EST
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Guillaume Smet 
• Fri Nov 09 2007 - 02:08:56 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help understanding stat numbers Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 09:49:41 EST
  • [PERFORM] Help understanding stat numbers Chris Hoover 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 12:14:35 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Robert Treat 
• Fri Nov 02 2007 - 10:46:11 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to avoid hashjoin and mergejoin Carlo Stonebanks 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 21:08:34 EST
  • Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 19:42:31 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 19:40:20 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 19:15:04 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance Tom Lane 
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance Tom Lane 
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 19:15:05 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 18:24:51 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Scott Marlowe 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 18:10:49 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Gregory Stark 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 17:51:20 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Join performance Steinar H. Gunderson 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 17:47:09 EST
  • [PERFORM] Join performance Pepe Barbe 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 17:01:41 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Vivek Khera 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 15:56:41 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Alan Hodgson 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 15:31:04 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Kevin Grittner 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 15:14:36 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Dimitri Fontaine 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 13:22:48 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Scott Marlowe 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 12:22:28 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 11:43:04 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Vivek Khera 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:47:44 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Chris Browne 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 11:41:18 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Vivek Khera 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 11:37:50 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] hp ciss on freebsd Vivek Khera 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:33:00 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:29:34 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Guillaume Smet 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:15:45 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Rafael Martinez 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:17:11 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Bill Moran 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:09:55 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Heikki Linnakangas 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:10:10 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Rafael Martinez 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 10:01:09 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 09:56:46 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Alvaro Herrera 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 09:49:36 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Rafael Martinez 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 06:20:22 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Tomáš Vondra 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 06:12:07 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Heikki Linnakangas 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 05:36:36 EST
  • [PERFORM] Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance Rafael Martinez 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 05:08:33 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Guillaume Smet 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 02:18:47 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Mark Kirkwood 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 01:21:10 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Gregory Stark 
• Thu Nov 08 2007 - 01:40:20 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Luke Lonergan 
• Wed Nov 07 2007 - 21:46:34 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Mark Kirkwood 
• Wed Nov 07 2007 - 18:36:16 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Guillaume Smet 
• Wed Nov 07 2007 - 18:32:55 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Guillaume Smet 
• Wed Nov 07 2007 - 18:14:08 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Tom Lane 
• Wed Nov 07 2007 - 11:58:49 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Tom Lane 
• Wed Nov 07 2007 - 11:52:16 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Guillaume Smet 
• Wed Nov 07 2007 - 11:34:52 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Tom Lane 
• Wed Nov 07 2007 - 11:32:15 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] index stat Kevin Grittner 
• Wed Nov 07 2007 - 08:38:04 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Guillaume Smet 
• Wed Nov 07 2007 - 08:25:40 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Alexander Staubo 
• Wed Nov 07 2007 - 07:53:16 EST
  • [PERFORM] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / Guillaume Smet 
• Tue Nov 06 2007 - 15:48:12 EST
  • [PERFORM] Subpar Execution Plan Jens-Wolfhard Schicke 
• Tue Nov 06 2007 - 13:10:10 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Greg Smith 
• Tue Nov 06 2007 - 10:18:51 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Dimitri Fontaine 
• Tue Nov 06 2007 - 09:15:39 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Tore Halset 
• Tue Nov 06 2007 - 09:14:19 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Tore Halset 
• Tue Nov 06 2007 - 08:48:31 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Stephen Frost 
• Tue Nov 06 2007 - 06:53:44 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Dimitri Fontaine 
• Tue Nov 06 2007 - 06:36:33 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] dell versus hp Claus Guttesen 
• Tue Nov 06 2007 - 05:12:23 EST
  • [PERFORM] dell versus hp Tore Halset 
• Tue Nov 06 2007 - 00:30:34 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Is ANALYZE transactional? Tom Lane 
• Tue Nov 06 2007 - 00:12:37 EST
  • [PERFORM] Is ANALYZE transactional? Craig James 
• Mon Nov 05 2007 - 21:47:02 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Database connections and stored procs (functions) Merlin Moncure 
• Mon Nov 05 2007 - 15:07:59 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Which index methodology is better?- Heikki Linnakangas 
• Mon Nov 05 2007 - 14:56:29 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Which index methodology is better?- Tom Lane 
• Mon Nov 05 2007 - 13:43:07 EST
  • [PERFORM] Which index methodology is better?- Chris Hoover 
• Mon Nov 05 2007 - 11:54:05 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Migrating to 8.3 - checkpoints and background writer Erik Jones 
• Mon Nov 05 2007 - 11:44:04 EST
  • [PERFORM] Training Recommendations Campbell, Lance 
• Mon Nov 05 2007 - 11:42:46 EST
  • [PERFORM] index stat Campbell, Lance 
• Mon Nov 05 2007 - 11:32:28 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] hp ciss on freebsd Greg Smith 
• Mon Nov 05 2007 - 10:47:53 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] hp ciss on freebsd Jeff Trout 
• Mon Nov 05 2007 - 10:32:46 EST
  • [PERFORM] Database connections and stored procs (functions) Radhika S 
• Mon Nov 05 2007 - 08:19:18 EST
  • [PERFORM] hp ciss on freebsd Claus Guttesen 
• Mon Nov 05 2007 - 07:12:27 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Gregory Stark 
• Mon Nov 05 2007 - 00:49:26 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 Mark Kirkwood 
• Sun Nov 04 2007 - 22:06:26 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Migrating to 8.3 - checkpoints and background writer Greg Smith 
• Sun Nov 04 2007 - 19:39:48 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Migrating to 8.3 - checkpoints and background writer Steinar H. Gunderson 
• Sun Nov 04 2007 - 19:33:46 EST
  • [PERFORM] Migrating to 8.3 - checkpoints and background writer Greg Smith 
• Sun Nov 04 2007 - 14:30:12 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Postgresql.conf Settings Heikki Linnakangas 
• Sun Nov 04 2007 - 13:30:28 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Postgresql.conf Settings smiley2211 
• Sun Nov 04 2007 - 12:37:02 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Postgresql.conf Settings Scott Marlowe 
• Sun Nov 04 2007 - 11:59:43 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Unfortunate expansion of composite types in union Jens-Wolfhard Schicke 
• Sun Nov 04 2007 - 11:28:30 EST
  • [PERFORM] Postgresql.conf Settings smiley2211 
• Sun Nov 04 2007 - 05:11:02 EST
  • Re: [PERFORM] Union within View vs.Union of Views Jeff Larsen 
• Sat Nov 03 2007 - 21:57:21 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Union within View vs.Union of Views Jeff Larsen 
• Sat Nov 03 2007 - 21:45:37 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] "MixedCase sensitive quoted" names Tom Lane 
• Sat Nov 03 2007 - 21:38:35 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Union within View vs.Union of Views Tom Lane 
• Sat Nov 03 2007 - 19:40:42 EDT
  • [PERFORM] "MixedCase sensitive quoted" names Whatever Deep 
• Sat Nov 03 2007 - 19:03:39 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Union within View vs.Union of Views Heikki Linnakangas 
• Sat Nov 03 2007 - 17:39:21 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Union within View vs.Union of Views Mark Mielke 
• Sat Nov 03 2007 - 16:22:18 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Union within View vs.Union of Views Jeff Larsen 
• Fri Nov 02 2007 - 14:45:48 EDT
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans] Alvaro Herrera 
• Fri Nov 02 2007 - 17:23:53 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL (RAID configurations) Mark F 
• Fri Nov 02 2007 - 16:03:12 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Mark F 
• Fri Nov 02 2007 - 10:05:13 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Jurgen Haan 
• Fri Nov 02 2007 - 06:44:24 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? Palle Girgensohn 
• Fri Nov 02 2007 - 06:32:08 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Unfortunate expansion of composite types in union Pavel Stehule 
• Fri Nov 02 2007 - 05:38:53 EDT
  • [PERFORM] Unfortunate expansion of composite types in union Jens-Wolfhard Schicke 
• Fri Nov 02 2007 - 03:56:04 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? hubert depesz lubaczewski 
• Fri Nov 02 2007 - 00:12:29 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to avoid hashjoin and mergejoin Carlo Stonebanks 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 23:31:03 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hardware for PostgreSQL Scott Marlowe 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 21:15:22 EDT
  • [PERFORM] hardware for PostgreSQL Mark Floyd 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 20:26:54 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Ow Mun Heng 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 17:41:58 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to avoid hashjoin and mergejoin Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 17:38:35 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] How to avoid hashjoin and mergejoin Scott Marlowe 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 16:57:34 EDT
  • [PERFORM] How to avoid hashjoin and mergejoin Carlo Stonebanks 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 14:16:13 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Steve Crawford 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 12:20:46 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Steve Crawford 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 11:47:32 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? Gregory Stark 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 11:34:42 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 11:28:53 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? Scott Marlowe 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 11:25:08 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? Palle Girgensohn 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 11:06:57 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 10:36:29 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? Palle Girgensohn 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 10:21:17 EDT
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans] Sami Dalouche 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 10:20:14 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? Palle Girgensohn 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 09:43:39 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 09:29:56 EDT
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] Outer joins and Seq scans] Tom Lane 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 09:07:55 EDT
  • [PERFORM] select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause? Palle Girgensohn 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 08:56:46 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Adam Tauno Williams 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 07:00:57 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hardware and For PostgreSQL Joe Uhl 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 03:52:21 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Magnus Hagander 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 03:46:01 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Ow Mun Heng 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 02:57:02 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] hardware and For PostgreSQL Magnus Hagander 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 02:54:50 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Magnus Hagander 
• Thu Nov 01 2007 - 02:52:41 EDT
  • Re: [PERFORM] Hardware for PostgreSQL Magnus Hagander 

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 31 2008 - 17:16:56 EDT