|
|
| Applications |
| Mailing Lists |
| Miscellaneous |
| Operating Systems |
| Programming |
Re: Antw: Re: [PORTS] 8.3beta2 fails to compile on Centos5 x86_64
Date: Sun Nov 11 2007 - 10:18:50 EST
"Marcel Gsteiger" <Marcel.Gsteiger@milprog.ch> writes:
>> Hmm. I suspect either we're short a BuildRequire or two, or you missed
>> something that's considered part of the standard minimum build
>> environment. The "exceptions" list on this page shows what Red Hat
>> considers the core set of packages that needn't be BuildRequire'd:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions
>> However, none of those look particularly likely to result in the
>> failure you're seeing here :-(. Could you send along the config.log
>> output?
> Thanks for your tip. In fact, my "basic packages, customize later"-type install from DVD did not install the following packages from the mentioned list:
> gcc-c++ > libstdc++-devel > redhat-rpm-config
> After I have installed these, everything now works perfectly.
Interesting. We don't do any C++ stuff, so I would hope that the first two of those are irrelevant. redhat-rpm-config, however, might well be relevant. I remember Devrim running into an odd build failure on a machine where it wasn't installed.
I wonder if it'd be worth explicitly BuildRequire'ing redhat-rpm-config in the PGDG SRPM? I don't feel the need to do it in Fedora/RHEL, because as mentioned there's an explicit policy not to for those projects. But it seems the PGDG RPMs get rebuilt in a rather wider variety of environments.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster Received on Sun Nov 11 10:19:29 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 18 2008 - 23:39:10 EDT
|
Contact Us Legal Notices Order Services Online Pantek Home Privacy Policy IT news Site Map Pantek Library |