|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Good bye
From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell(at)gmail.com>
Date: Thu Jan 31 2008 - 12:44:43 EST
>>> However, I see no evidence that this is >>> intentional on the Fedora teams part. Nor do I see how it would >>> benefit them from exhausting energy into blocking things. >> Whether it is a benefit or not depends on the user experience they want >> to generate. Who would it harm to provide instructions for installing >> common and needed vendor-provide drivers, for example? Is it necessary >> to be hostile to both your own users and the best hardware vendors, or >> the company that invented java and wants to give it away? > > Instructions from say the community since Fedora is a community based > distribution? > * fedorasolved.org > * fedoraunity.org If some entity in the community provided a repository containing, for example, the Nvidia drivers that many users need, could said entity get their repository configuration included in this "community based distribution" to make installation automatic? > I think you're way offline with considering lack of support for this And I think it is reasonable to compare it to other distributions like ubuntu instead of just assuming that the hostility should push users to the for-pay version conveniently provided by a related company.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@gmail.com
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Received on Thu Jan 31 12:43:13 2008This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun May 25 2008 - 05:36:59 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||