|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Internet Explorer 0day exploit
From: Bigby Findrake <bigby(at)ephemeron.org>
Date: Wed Jul 18 2007 - 14:37:02 EDT
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Chris Stromblad wrote: <deletia> > One more thing about "advisories". I think it would be better to release With regards to your last statement, I would like to believe that that's so, or at least that if there is some harm in "early release" of information that that harm is mitigated (if not outright outweighed) by the potential good that's done by alerting the community and thereby allowing them to develop their own responses. I guess what we're really talking about here is the perceived potential negative impact of letting the bad guys know that a vulnerability exists in space X (that they might then attempt to exploit where without that knowledge, they wouldn't try to exploit it even if it could be argued that they would attempt to find it) vs. the perceived potential good of allowing the good guys to attempt to formulate their own defenses tangential to some sort of "official" response. It seems to me that without metrics (how many early release advisories turned into exploits that wouldn't have been created without said advisory?) that all discussion on this topic is either philosophical or academic (which is not to imply "without merit"). > Anyways, enough ranting. I, for one, enjoyed your rant.
finger://ephemeron.org/bigby http://www.ephemeron.org/~bigby/ irc://irc.ephemeron.org/#the_pub news://news.ephemeron.org/alt.lemurs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRp5dzuG50ohcWywfEQIaGwCdFvAHqttbczpDKBmJXkJZrDf1/BgAnRzh
tNxtwD2MTu+qYgDY0EpRCuC0
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 28 2007 - 06:09:42 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||