|
|||||||||||
|
defining 0day
From: Gadi Evron <ge(at)linuxbox.org>
Date: Tue Sep 25 2007 - 15:02:27 EDT
Okay. I think we exhausted the different views, and maybe we are now able to come to a conlusion on what we WANT 0day to mean. What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless of previous definitions? Obviously, the term has become charged in the past couple of years with the targeted office vulnerabilities attacks, WMF, ANI, etc. We require a term to address these, just as much as we do "unpatched vulnerability" or "fully disclosed vulnerability". What other such descriptions should we consider before proceeding? non-disclosure? Gadi. Received on Tue Sep 25 15:43:43 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 28 2007 - 06:17:54 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||