|
|||||||||||
|
Firewall Activity analysis
From: Terry Ziemniak <tmz(at)hawk.swc.com>
Date: Wed Dec 11 2002 - 11:00:29 EST
I have been working on firewall activity analysis for Pix firewalls for a while. I have written a perl script that parses the log files and puts all of the data into an Access database. This allows me to run queries such as “List all successful TCP connections for everyone who had more than 1 explicit denied connection”. This is an explicit (rigid ?) way to flag bad behavior. However I was wondering it makes sense (now that all of the data is in a database) to attempt statistical analysis of this data to flag bad behavior. I could look at the HTTP bytes, or number of connections, or time (etc) and flag source IPs that deviate from the norm by a certain amount. I could do this without setting hard limits (such as ‘list the top 1% incoming HTTP users’) which would limit that amount of IPs flagged as bad. Of course this would be applicable to any protocol. The goal of this is to flag suspicious communications that should be more thoroughly investigated.
At this point this is a mental exercise but I was wondering if anyone
had any thoughts or opinions on the matter.
Thanks. Terry Received on Wed Dec 11 13:35:51 2002 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:04 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||