Hosting Provided By

Re: Active response... some thoughts.

From: Ali Saifullah Khan <ali_saifullah(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mon Feb 03 2003 - 14:18:15 EST

Todd's question still remains. I'm sure you tried to clear it out, but does a "TCP" RST have any effect on "UDP"-oriented connections ? We're dealing with 2 different protocols here. The protocol behind the RST packet being TCP raises the previous question, and that's what we're trying to figure out here.

Original Message ----- From: mb_lima <mb_lima@uol.com.br> To: <b_paul_palmer@yahoo.com> Cc: <focus-ids@securityfocus.com> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:34 PM Subject: Re: Active response... some thoughts.

> Hi Paul,
Received on Wed Feb 5 17:15:37 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Talisker: "Re: Gig TAPs"
Previous message: Gonzalez, Albert: "RE: Active response... some thoughts."
In reply to: mb_lima: "Re: Active response... some thoughts."
In reply to mb_lima: "Re: Active response... some thoughts."
Next in thread: Abe L. Getchell: "RE: Active response... some thoughts."
Reply: Abe L. Getchell: "RE: Active response... some thoughts."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:08 EDT