|
|||||||||||
|
RE: False Positives with IntruVert
From: Kohlenberg, Toby <toby.kohlenberg(at)intel.com>
Date: Tue Apr 15 2003 - 18:23:15 EDT
For instance, Snort has (had? Brian Caswell's been cleaning the rules a lot recently) a rule that looks just for URLs that start with HEAD instead of GET. This is done because it is one of the techniques that Whisker uses to avoid being seen. The result if you turn this on is a lot of false positives (events that contain the string but aren't important) but also the potential to actually catch scans that are novel in every other way. The problem is that the value of the alert by itself is very very low but not zero. So, how do you score this? toby > -----Original Message-----
It is heavy on the math side of things, but this is good since it begins to put questions about false positives on a rigorous footing. (The paper does not answer your specific question above, but it does provide an interesting perspective on false positives in general). --Mike
Michael Rash
INTRUSION PREVENTION: READY FOR PRIME TIME? IntruShield now offers unprecedented Intrusion IntelligenceTM capabilities - including intrusion identification, relevancy, direction, impact and analysis - enabling a path to prevention. Download the latest white paper "Intrusion Prevention: Myths, Challenges, and Requirements" at: http://www.securityfocus.com/IntruVert-focus-ids INTRUSION PREVENTION: READY FOR PRIME TIME? IntruShield now offers unprecedented Intrusion IntelligenceTM capabilities - including intrusion identification, relevancy, direction, impact and analysis - enabling a path to prevention. Download the latest white paper "Intrusion Prevention: Myths, Challenges, and Requirements" at: http://www.securityfocus.com/IntruVert-focus-ids Received on Tue Apr 15 18:26:40 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:11 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||