|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Views and Correlation in Intrusion Detection
From: Blake Matheny <bmatheny(at)mkfifo.net>
Date: Wed Jul 02 2003 - 12:33:37 EDT
If you look at the ietf draft, sections 6.17 and 6.19 clearly state that it
'The IDMEF itself MUST be extensible'. I think using some of the IDMEF fields
for a required (or suggested) set of data is okay. Bishops' paper, "A Standard
Audit Trail Format", proposed a very general, novel format for audit data. His
proposed solution allows you to describe a very large set of data. I think
augmenting IDMEF, with something like Bishop's solution can be appropriate. If
you check section 4.2.4.6 of
In terms of normalizing IDS data, are we talking about converting from the original format to an intermediary? If so, we start getting into issues of message semantics, data transformations, and lots of other areas that no one seems to be wanting to tread :-) If you look at related research literature, much of it assumes a common format. Cheers, -Blake
Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis?
-- Blake Matheny "... one of the main causes of the fall of the bmatheny@mkfifo.net Roman Empire was that, lacking zero, they had http://www.mkfifo.net no way to indicate successful termination of http://ovmj.org/GNUnet/ their C programs." --Robert Firth ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attend the Black Hat Briefings & Training, July 28 - 31 in Las Vegas, the world's premier technical IT security event! 10 tracks, 15 training sessions, 1,800 delegates from 30 nations including all of the top experts, from CSO's to "underground" security specialists. See for yourself what the buzz is about! Early-bird registration ends July 3. This event will sell out. www.blackhat.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Wed Jul 2 14:14:19 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:15 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||