Pantek Library
Hosting Provided By
CybrHost
High Speed Hosting

Re: IDS is dead, etc

From: Bennett Todd <bet(at)rahul.net>
Date: Fri Aug 08 2003 - 13:40:21 EDT

2003-08-08T13:24:46 Scott Wimer:
> I think we are on the same page as to the utility of IDS systems.

Agreed.

> Where we differ is in our estimation of the level of vulnerability of

I'm not convinced this is true. I feel that you're putting words in my mouth. Unless I'm misunderstanding you, you seem to be responding to a claim that one can have perfectly secure software. I've not made such a claim, and will stand beside you refuting it. Perhaps once again my poor choice of words in that initial statement "perfect firewall" is biting me.

> The number of systems that are backdoored -- today, and the number

Sure --- but unless the black hats are the folks selling the IDSe, the IDSes won't catch these secret exploits anyway.

Do you need help?X

> Although, some will argue that the more behavioral oriented NIDS

I've heard of one device that I can believe can alert on a heretofore totally unknown exploit. Not all of 'em, of course, but some. That's Mazu Networks's enforcer/profiler gizmos. I myself wouldn't call 'em an IDS, I think they're something different, much more valuable, and their IDS functionality is the smallest part of what they're good at. To my tastes, their host classification and "what-if" modelling are the really hot capabilities. If they were as affordable as an IDS, then I think they'd help bolster your claim, but they really are something else and different.

IDSes detect known exploits, and sometimes heretofore unknown exploits of clearly known and understood vulnerabilities.

-Bennett

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Mon Aug 11 10:50:38 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:16 EDT


Contact Us  Legal Notices  Order Services Online 
Pantek Home  Privacy Policy  IT news  Site Map  Pantek Library