|
|||||||||||
|
Re: NIS with local root
From: Charles Clancy <security(at)xauth.net>
Date: Thu Jan 30 2003 - 17:31:13 EST On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Kevin Jackson wrote: > but surely in such a situation where NIS and NFS is employed -- you
The usual problem is when users have their own machines and want access to the NFS network. They don't want to give up root on their own machines. > I know sometimes it can't be avoided in some situations -- if that's the
NIS+ is not much more secure than NIS if you have root. In all the installations I've seen, the only difference is that the NIS+ client won't let normal users see the encrypted passwords (from "niscat passwd.org_dir"). Plus, NIS+ support for Linux isn't entirely complete. The real solution is to get rid of NIS and NFS, and replace them with AFS, LDAP, and Kerberos. AFS does file access control at a user level, rather than a host level. That means local root can't get access to your files[1] -- only AFS admin can do that. The LDAP/Kerberos option means no more unshadowed passwords floating around the network. http://www.openafs.orghttp://www.openldap.orghttp://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/ All are well supported under Linux (not to mention many other UNIXes, and even the ability to interact almost seamlessly with Microsoft ADS). -- [1] Well, he can try to steal your Kerberos credentials if you're logged in to the machine, but he can't just "su". [ t charles clancy ]--[ tclancy@uiuc.edu ]--[ www.uiuc.edu/~tclancy ]Received on Thu Jan 30 18:15:33 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:19 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||