|
|||||||||||
|
Re: IIS 4 Security
From: Deus, Attonbitus <Thor(at)HammerofGod.com>
Date: Fri Dec 13 2002 - 13:49:46 EST -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 10:13 AM 12/13/2002, H D Moore wrote:
Certainly no excuse for such a deployment, but I think the OP was more interested in the theory behind authenticated-only access configurations and what 'inherent' security such a setup would offer against 'direct' attacks on the public system. One could indeed try to exploit a internal client system first and use authenticated access as in your example (assuming integrated authentication was in use) or some other insidious methods-- I would still assert that the OP's contention that "It is reasonably secure right up until a brute force attack or eaves dropping yields a valid username/pass" is correct-- it is "reasonably secure." I found Henry's post very interesting, specifically the notion that the request is first parsed before the ACL applied to see what object was being called in the first place. If correct, that would support the theory that one could exploit a component with ACL's on it before the ACL was enforced. I just couldn't get that to work in any of my tests (which was good!). Any other comments about that particular theory? AD -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBPforyohsmyD15h5gEQIL1ACgv9slfkEUk4cGKkUHzmgMqRFBquoAn0ac
RPXfMRStdwHBckSeq3baiYMH
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:25 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||