|
|||||||||||
|
RE: website inside or outside the domain?
From: David Ellis <dellis(at)nightwatchnss.com>
Date: Tue Feb 11 2003 - 17:53:29 EST
Sincerely,
-----Original Message-----
Hi Chris, Don't think of it as "joining" in to the domain, which is not a very good practice anyway... think of it as TRUSTING the inner (users) domain. What I think you should do with your web server if you need any sort of user validation is to build a second domain in the DMZ, lets say, your web and 2nd tier database. This domain should trust your internal domain and that way you can use the same users as you do in the inside of the company. Remember that trusts don't work in the direction you build them... that means that if you build the trust from your DMZs domain to the inside, the inner users will be trusted in the DMZ's domain, but if for some strange reason your box gets compromised, the users in that box won't be trusted in the inside of your company. Let me know if you need any further help.
Regards,
-----Original Message----- From: Chris W. Parker Sent: Mon 10-Feb-03 3:23 PM To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Cc: Subject: website inside or outside the domain? Hello. Is it a better practice in general to join a webserver to a domain or to leave it in it's own workgroup? The reason I ask is because managing the permissions on the webserver is made difficult since I don't have access to the domain users and groups. That is, (as far as I know) I cannot add a domain group (i.e. DOMAIN\weborders) to a resource on the webserver. Instead I have to make a group locally on the webserver that mimics the group (and users in that group) on the domain. Another reason I would like to join the webserver to the domain is because I could turn off Anonymous Access and force the users to login. BUT I am imagining their domain credentials would automatically be passed to the intranet site thus logging them in automagically. I would then have access to their username's from within my .asp pages. The only reason I have not joined the server to the domain yet is because I am not sure what sorts of negative side effects there might be that I don't know about. Can anyone shed any light on these situations and/or offeralternatives? Thanks, Chris.** eSafe-portsmouth scanned this email for viruses, vandals and malicious content ** Received on Wed Feb 12 11:01:20 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:26 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||