|
|||||||||||
|
RE: MS Software Update Service
From: Brad Judy <judy(at)colorado.edu>
Date: Thu Feb 20 2003 - 15:11:14 EST
There are some definite pros and cons for SUS. The most notable pro, of course, is the price. It is a free (outside of Windows Server licenses) solution for allowing clients to grab critical updates from a local, approved list. There are several cons: -Limited scope of patches (critical updates to IE and OS only) -Scheduled pull topology (can't push out an urgent patch) -Poor logging (minimal server-side logging and some client-side logging) Overall it's something to consider, but not nearly the same as the third-party solutions you mentioned. Those allow for a much broader range of patches to be applied and are generally push based. Personally I found Hfnetchk Pro to be the most appealing of the tools I tried, but the minimum license size of 50 systems was not appealing to someone who maintains only a handful of infrastructure servers. For our distributed environment the current version of SMS is not manageable due to its need for domain admin level access. I am hopeful that the next version will have more potential for environments like mine. Brad Judy
Information Technology Services
> -----Original Message-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:27 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||