|
|||||||||||
|
RE: CA-SSL in IIS
From: Lance Wolrab DNET <LWolrab(at)deltanet.net>
Date: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 12:55:17 EDT
Setting up your own CA brings its own set of decisions. Do you want to be an intermediate CA and use someone else's root certificate to provide the automatic, built-in, seamless connection for users who are not SSL savvy? Do you want to distribute your self-signed root certificate to your enterprise for internal applications to avoid the cost of a third party solution (I did this)? Are you prepared to support the fault-tolerance and redundancy requirements of being your own CA? Will you support Microsoft products exclusively, or do you see a need to support Apache or Sun One servers? If you do, Microsoft's built-in CA will not provide you a total solution and you need to decide if you want to have two CAs that trust each other in some fashion to support the other platforms. As you can see, there are a lot of decisions to make at the outset and much like designing an Active Directory, you can paint yourself in a corner pretty quickly if you fail to address the important issues. Lance Wolrab
-----Original Message-----
What drawbacks are there in becoming your own certificate service? Versus one of the major SSL services? Other than that the source of the certificate (if the user looked it up) would not be a commercially known provider and you couldn't participate in any of the major provider's ever so valuable certificate programs.
Ed Sunder
>You can easily do it using the Microsoft CA service. There
>----------------------------------------------------------------------- - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Tue Jul 15 14:37:59 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:34 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||