RE: how broken are antivirus products? > oh yeah, as an additional piece of data. i have obtained
I am looking forward to reading your book. Here are some thoughts
regarding your research and questions:
- getting nMB mbox file that - according to your friends information -
contain viruses and using it for scan engine rate detection isn't
acceptable, unless you first replicated all the samples and took the
mbox file from infected machine.
- there are couple of av test schemes used by third party - some of them
were pointed in previous messages, so I will only point at one
additional: Virus Bulletin (and it's 100% award). I don't see a lot of
sense of designing the same or similar pattern to the one which is used
already and has industry creditability, unless your method can reveal
some new information. I am not trying to be the judge here... However I
believe that some standards like sample replication must be used in any
reasonable AV scan engine test.
- the problem of changing code by using different compilers on different
hosts or using different compiler options (like code optimization
techniques) to generate functionally identical, but different on opcode
level binary is not a new problem. This could be solved with choosing
correct signature in a place of code that should not change or by
analyzing code characteristic / behavior during code emulation.
- the problem might be to detect viruses for X platform using Y
platform. It takes some work to emulate system calls, libraries, memory
layout etc.
Best Regards,
Aleksander Czarnowski
AVET INS
Received on Wed Nov 20 00:49:04 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:38 EDT
|