Re: Internet worm / definitions
This is a slightly controversial area (i.e. the experts don't necessarily
agree), however, loosely speaking the
difference between a worm and a virus is that the latter infects files, and
the former infects systems.
A chap called Simon Widlake (sadly now deceased), defined it thus -
"Viruses infect - Worms infest"
A true virus requires a host file (of whatever type - PE, executable etc)
to attach to/insert itself into whereas worms
are self contained, dropping copies of themselves onto the system. Most of
the modern crop of worms that
we see fall into this category because they do not actually infect any
other files. Some fall into both, - such as Klez, which is
a worm, but which drops a virus called Elkern.
True worms such as Slammer, CodeRed, Slapper, do not require intervention
to run, and in the case of the first two, never drop any files
of themselves at all, they exist only "on the wire" or in the memory of the
machines they infect. However, it is usual to refer to both these
true worms and the other type all as worms. As with many such things, there
are few people who care enough to use the terms
in their technically correct fashion, hence the ultimate confusion.
regards
Joao Schim
To: Focus-Virus
cc:
15/05/2003 14:38 Subject: Internet worm / definitions
Hello virus people,
Various organisations, virus professionals, classify almost all modern
virusses as being an "Internet Worm"..
What exactly is it that makes a virus a worm? Logic thinking might
imply that only virusses that send them selves automatically
without user intervention should be called worm.
But seemingly even virusses that get _activated_ by users, by means
of opening atachements, are called Internet worms..
What is the difference between a Worm and a *regular* i.e. mass-mailing
virus? Or is any via internet-transported virus a worm per definition ?
Thanks for explaining in advance.
Joao.
- Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper ***
Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies
that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats.
Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown
enterprise WLANs.
To get your FREE white paper visit us at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-focus-virus
- Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper ***
Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies
that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats.
Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown enterprise WLANs.
To get your FREE white paper visit us at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-focus-virus Received on Thu May 15 12:29:20 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:39 EDT
|