|
|||||||||||
|
RE: Internet worm / definitions
From: Brad <gryphonn(at)austarnet.com.au>
Date: Fri May 16 2003 - 19:01:47 EDT
Just to put some sort of near closure to this thread, we could always go back to the original comparison, in the context it was intended. Viruses need a host program to infect and therefore survive and spread. The host program is carried to another computer and passed into the system by some means to further infect. This roughly equates to a virus passing and surviving from one body to another by close or intimate contact. We could think of a worm as something like a bacterium, Staphylococcus for example. Staphylococcus can be passed by other means, such as in food, fluids or a benchtop. The bacterium waits for another host to pick it up. In other words a worm can be passed via e-mail, a website or other means and propagate in the next computer it reaches when the computer (and user) 'eats' the bacteria filled food (e-mail attachment) that the worm is attached to. So, could we say a virus is a virus and a worm is a bacterium? The comparisons could even be expanded; a virus usually infects with minimal visible signs until it is almost too late to treat. A bacterium infects and may give obvious visual clues early in the infection process. Having said all that, the virus/worm debate will continue long after the 'trustworthy computing' catchphrase is filed to the bit-bucket.
Cheers,
> -----Original Message-----
To get your FREE white paper visit us at: http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-focus-virus Received on Sat May 17 15:58:42 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:39 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||