RE: Bugbear.b not blocked! why?
I've heard more 'rumblings' about the current reincarnation of bugbear not
being blocked 100% by AV - though a good practice would be to rigorously
block/strip every attachement that contains '.exe', '.scr' or '.pif'
somewhere in its filename. In combination with nohtml.dll (if you happen to
run Outlook 2000/2002, see e.g.
http://ntbugtraq.ntadvice.com/default.asp?sid=1&pid=55&did=38) this would
stop practically all Bears dead in their tracks, without harming
functionality too much.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Warr [mailto:nick@mobilia.it]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:53 AM
To: gdecurtis@ennedi.com
Cc: focus-virus@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Bugbear.b not blocked! why?
I've seen viruses pass when they were corrupted (and non functional), we use
a different mail scanner (rav) though.
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: <gdecurtis@ennedi.com>
To: <focus-virus@securityfocus.com>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:04 PM
Subject: Bugbear.b not blocked! why?
> Hi all,
-
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tue Jun 10 12:55:50 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:39 EDT
|