|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Anti-vrus auto-replies
From: Brian Eckman <eckman(at)umn.edu>
Date: Mon Jun 30 2003 - 11:28:39 EDT
Jonas Anden wrote:
(snip) Yep. I went out on a limb and several times publicly questioned our University's decision to autoreply to the "sender" of a virus or worm, even though I basically worked for the same department as the staff who had made that decision. Finally, they did decide to stop. I used to run an E-mail server for my previous department here, and over 95% of the virus-infected E-mail that we received month after month were from one of the many worms that forge the FROM: and/or MAIL FROM: entry in the header. That means that less than 5% of the messages that would have been sent out would have went to those actually sending the virus.
<rant>
Moral of the story: STOP AUTO-REPLYING WHEN A VIRUS IS RECEIVED!!! My 0.02 $CURRENCY Brian -- Brian Eckman Security Analyst OIT Security and Assurance University of Minnesota 612-626-7737 "There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those who don't." --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Mon Jun 30 14:29:42 2003 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 23 2006 - 14:01:39 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||